Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#paythatman


Panthro

Recommended Posts

I do not know what type of offer was made to Norman this offseason but I'd say what ever it was please bump it up a bit and get this guy locked up for 4 years. 

Look at Allen Robinson stat line against Norman...this week he went for 155 yards an two TDS

Look at Deandre Hopkins stat line against Norman....last week he went for 98 yards and two  TDs

Having a CB who can marginalize a teams #1 WR is Donald Trump HUUUUUUGGGGGEEEEEE, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norman is playing good.

Our scheme and D has a lot to do with it....Rivera too.  A lot of his almost plays aren't lock down coverage but zone schemes working.

plus our D gives him lots of help not just in pass rush but over the top.

All that said, I'd like to keep him for a good price.  If he wants elite CB money let him walk. Don't need to pay that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...