Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who loses first


Verge

Recommended Posts

Most likely us.  I hate Atlanta as much as you guys do, but their upcoming schedule (with Romo out) is a lot easier than ours.  The next 10 games for each team - 

Falcons: @ Cowboys, vs Texans, vs Redskins, @ Saints, @ Titans, vs Buccaneers, @ 49ers, vs Colts, vs Vikings

Panthers: vs Saints, @ Buccaneers, @ Seahawks, vs Eagles, vs Colts, vs Packers, @ Titans, vs Redskins, @ Cowboys (Romo might be back), @ Saints 

It's possible the Redskins could drop the Falcons if DeSean Jackson is back, but I don't think Cousins is any good.  I think Dallas would have beaten them but we know Romo will be out.  Colts might be their toughest game and that won't be for awhile.  Saints could definitely beat them if Brees is back, but mainly because it's a divisional game.

Now that doesn't mean I think they will start the season 12-0 or anything, just that they have an easier schedule than us and thus probably have better odds to go the longest without a loss.  Seahawks, Packers, and Cowboys if Romo is back are going to be really tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cowboys o-line will destroy ATL d-line.

Probably, but Brandon Weeden is trash.

I forgot about the 49ers.  Pittsburgh put a thrashing on them on Sunday but I don't think they are that bad.  Should be able to keep it close and potentially secure a W, especially with it being a home game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our first loss is the dreaded bye week game.  Bye week alone has Rivera's number thus far and it matches up w/ our toughest road game of the year.

So we go 4-1 and our loss comes week 6.

 

Atlanta?  There schedule? Dang, just looking there schedule currently looks easy as poo.   I'm gonna assume Foster is healthy by week 4.  So they go 3-1 and lose week 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATL. they have plenty of fire and chippy moxie, which is cute, but they're still largely a one-dimensional team. we've seen how this one ends before.

We're a one dimensional team, outside our defense the only two players on Offense that I have any confidence in is Cam Newton and Greg Olsen, serious issues there. 

Good news is that we are the only team in the NFCS that has a Defense.  Which may very well be the one thing that lets us win the division this year.  Honestly I think just winning the NFCS with a winning record would be a victory for us, with a best case making the NFCC.  We arent winning a superbowl with this team as it stands now, and it would be a miracle for us to just make the NFCC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a one dimensional team, outside our defense the only two players on Offense that I have any confidence in is Cam Newton and Greg Olsen, serious issues there. 

Good news is that we are the only team in the NFCS that has a Defense.  Which may very well be the one thing that lets us win the division this year.  Honestly I think just winning the NFCS with a winning record would be a victory for us, with a best case making the NFCC.  We arent winning a superbowl with this team as it stands now, and it would be a miracle for us to just make the NFCC.

if you consider dimensions of a team to be run defense, pass defense, run offense, and pass offense, and special teams, we're a 4-dimensional team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a one dimensional team, outside our defense the only two players on Offense that I have any confidence in is Cam Newton and Greg Olsen, serious issues there. 

Good news is that we are the only team in the NFCS that has a Defense.  Which may very well be the one thing that lets us win the division this year.  Honestly I think just winning the NFCS with a winning record would be a victory for us, with a best case making the NFCC.  We arent winning a superbowl with this team as it stands now, and it would be a miracle for us to just make the NFCC.

A division title and a winning record?  I'd be happy.  Not sure our ceiling is much higher unless something crazy happens....like we stumble across a WR version of Jake Delhomme of something.  Which seems a bit far fetched

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you consider dimensions of a team to be run defense, pass defense, run offense, and pass offense, and special teams, we're a 4-dimensional team.

to be fair, we have only seen this years D vs. Yeldon and Blue at RB....and passing O's lead by Bortles and Mallett.

So how good we are us still unknown.  We could be great.  Could be good.   Think with how weak our O is we need greatness to make a run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATL is a pretender right now.

they got a shot in the arm from the new staff but they will fold down the stretch and Ryan will start crying and staining his pants after 2 doses of Star, KK, CJ.

 God I wish we played Atlanta sooner.  Their O-Line still sucks and we can rack up 6+ sacks easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...