Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Cotch is back for Seattle who gets cut, if anyone?


WesleyM

Recommended Posts

Today coach Rivera said it was possible Cotch would be healthy for the Seattle game. My question is does anyone get the axe with him becoming active? I honestly believe Bersin has contributed enough over the last few weeks to stay on the roster. He is a great posession guy. My thought is to cut the guy from Seattle and if he clears waviers add him to the PS. It is clear he hasnt picked up the system and I would think if a danger of him getting picked up existed we probably would have given more than a conditional 7th to get the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I'm glad none of you are GMs cutting a guy that's barely seen the field? Who has potential and is young? Y'all are getting crazy in the Huddle these days

I'm sure no GM wants to cut a guy. But it has to happen. 

It's not that you want to cut guy, but we are playing to win. If Norwood can't help that right now, bye. Say hi to the practice squad. His turn might come again this year. Who do you propose we cut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean he is on the roster, we could just make a different player inactive, but that would be too logical.

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Stop, the both of you!

Knowledge of the rules and logic have no place in the huddle!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...