Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS Picks for week 6


KissMyConverse

Recommended Posts

We really shouldn't be favored in this game. I have no problem with the 'Hawks being favored.

Had we have TD(fully healthy,) Kuechly (again...fully healthy,) CJ, Big Frank and KB active...that's another story. But this game will be close. 

ShaQ, much like TD, was brought in to cover receivers over the middle and mirror qb's. That should really help at limiting Wilson and I wouldn't be surprised to see Shaq lay the little bugger out, in the upcoming game.

This is gonna be our biggest test of the season and only GB will be Better opponents on our schedule. Can't wait for our team to be fully healthy for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Typical that you can't respond to the actual statement. Instead you make fun with no rebuttal.

what are you talking about? That was actually funny...unless you were serious. You weren't serious were you? Please for the love of all that is holy you weren't serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks are the safe bet, especially for the media. It's a no lose to pick them. If they win, you win. If they lose, you get to write a story about 'what is wrong with Seattle?!'

word for word what i was going to say

Monday rolls around and the "Has the window closed on the Seahawks?" #hottakes will be in full swing.

lol at anybody that thinks we will earn any credit when we win this game. 

Losing to us would be the barometer of whether or not people think Seattle is a good or bad team. 

If you wanna cry about something, cry about that and go keep winning football games and making analysts cry when the 'lowly' Panthers refuse to just go away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it ever really matter that we're picked or not picked to win?

We have to go out there and earn the win either way. Our team is set up with players who want to be here, who want to make their mark on the game now and who want to prove themselves to the rest of the league. We're up against a team that has been there, done that and is starting to be pulled apart by the very fact that they have been on top -- fat paychecks, the desire for reworked deals, the "we are the best" mantras. 

This is the kind of game where you can catch a glimpse of the changing of the guard. We're built for this game, at this time and against this opponent. And we're going to have to go their house and take them to the woodshed right in front of their 12th men.

This won't be pretty. It won't matter who picked us to lose. All that matters is that we walk away with the win.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I wasn't a fan of either team, and was just looking at our losing streak with Seattle, along with the bottom dwellers we've beaten so far, I'd probably pick the hawks too. Respect comes from beating good teams, so we need to do some of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...