Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was anyone else disappointed with Sam Rosen?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

His lack of senile old man moments during the game was disappointing.  There were no Donald LaFell's, Burton Breslin's, or calling us the Carolina Hurricanes.  He only messed up a few adjectives and pronouns.  I was waiting for him to butcher Benwikere's name.  He must be taking his stroke medication.  It's not NFL football to me without those senile old man moments.  Ronde Barber is trying his best with all the pain meds he pops but it's just not the same.  That said I can't wait until Jon Gruden is old, that'll be fuging amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's true, he called a pretty good game.  Maybe he switched medication.  There was one point where I thought he called us the dolphins.  I rewound and it was all in my head.

I know what you mean, I was wanted to hear something crazy so bad that I started making stuff up in my head.  Maybe that's how it starts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...