Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kawann Short named NFC Defensive Player of the Month


Growl

Recommended Posts

A couple of interesting tweets:

Max Henson @PanthersMax 9m9 minutes ago

5 sacks and 19 tackles for Kawann Short in October. Panthers have won first two Defensive Player of Month awards - Josh Norman and now KK.

 

Jonathan Jones @jjones9 9m9 minutes ago

Josh Norman won the award in September, and now Kawann Short wins it for October. That's two for two for the Panthers

 

Black & Blue Review @BlackBlueReview 8m8 minutes ago

This is just the second time the #Panthers have had two NFC Defensive Players of the Month in a season ('08 - Beason/Oct, Peppers/Nov).

 

Black & Blue Review @BlackBlueReview 6m6 minutes ago

So two Players of the Month and neither are Luke Kuechly. Decent defense, eh?

 

David Newton @DNewtonespn 6m6 minutes ago

Panthers' Kawann Short is first DT in Panthers history to be named NFC Defensive Player of Month. Short has... http://espn.go.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0451382891125937596-4 

 

Bryan Strickland @PanthersBryan 6m6 minutes ago

Bryan Strickland Retweeted Carolina Panthers

KK is the 11th Panther to earn the honor but the first defensive tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of interesting tweets:

Max Henson @PanthersMax 9m9 minutes ago

5 sacks and 19 tackles for Kawann Short in October. Panthers have won first two Defensive Player of Month awards - Josh Norman and now KK

Those are eye-popping stats for a DT.

Actually, those would be great stats for a rush DE.

What a month for KK. I think this guy is still criminally under-appreciated by our fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...