Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Youngins at the games.


toldozer

Recommended Posts

.. really dude?  did I hurt your feelings that bad?

this was a discussion in another thread (in the appropriate forum) and is not panther related

our child has been to several events where there is screaming, etc.  .. she doesn't "cry" like you assume 

also, games don't actually get that loud .. been going since 1995 and have experienced MNF etc.

stick to the point of the thread in the other forum - a simple question

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're bringing your daughter because YOU want to bring her, not because she wants to go and will know/remember/realize anything about being at the game.  

Same reason parents shouldn't bring infants to Disney - if they're not old enough to know/appreciate why they're there, don't bother.  Nothing wrong with waiting until she's at least 5 yrs old before experiencing BoA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I desperately want to attend a game before the end of the season with our newborn because she hasn't been able to go to a game since Jacksonville (preggos, bebe, and all of that).

Should I tell her that we're not allowed to go unless she pumps enough milk to leave for a babysitter because some fans are douchenozzles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

My wife and I desperately want to attend a game before the end of the season with our newborn because she hasn't been able to go to a game since Jacksonville (preggos, bebe, and all of that).

Should I tell her that we're not allowed to go unless she pumps enough milk to leave for a babysitter because some fans are douchenozzles?

This sounds entitled. It's a choice to have a child that you'll need to make adjustments for. Nobody is a douche for not wanting to sit next to a newborn at an NFL game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

My wife and I desperately want to attend a game before the end of the season with our newborn because she hasn't been able to go to a game since Jacksonville (preggos, bebe, and all of that).

Should I tell her that we're not allowed to go unless she pumps enough milk to leave for a babysitter because some fans are douchenozzles?

Lol it's a newborn you could bring a new born monkey and it would have the same experience. until the thing you bring to the game can tell you it's favorite play of the game it's voting for Obama type idiocy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a new parent so I can understand. My wife and I both wanted to go to a game this year too. So we had family watch him, she's breastfeeding and was able to pump ahead.  

It's not an environment that I would take a 14 month old. The games do get loud and I believe you will have a hard time enjoying the game worrying about your daughter.

Is a sitter/family not an option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Icege said:

My wife and I desperately want to attend a game before the end of the season with our newborn because she hasn't been able to go to a game since Jacksonville (preggos, bebe, and all of that).

Should I tell her that we're not allowed to go unless she pumps enough milk to leave for a babysitter because some fans are douchenozzles?

No.

You should tell her you cant go because your priorities have now changed and an NFL football game pales in comparison to the health and comfort of your newborn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...