Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jared Allen retiring


jamos14

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Great football player. Even a better individual. Huge supporter of our Troops. Oh the days of having good people on this league are going away. 

 

 

Now, we have to root for young pot heads, alcoholics, me-first type of players. 

We do?  I've seen plenty of good young guys, playing on the team we're all here to support.  Kind of a silly statement, if serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I'm a Panthers fan. Then, secondly I'm a damn football fan fool. Id like to enjoy watching football no matter whether that's peewee, HS, College, or the NFL. 

 

C'mon Chuckie. You made a goofy azz comment. Got called out on it. Then got all salty over it? I have a minor suggestion for you. Think before you hit submit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I'm not talking about just the Panthers. Im talking about the entire NFL. 

 

But, Frank Alexander and former Hardy are two of them.

You're basing your judgement of "now, we have to root for young pot heads, alcoholics, me-first type of players," off of an extremely small portion of the players in the league.  Players that you're not watching or cheering for anyway, because they are never around for very long.  That's not really fair to the large majority, who are actually really good people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

His retirement, if confirmed, leaves us with nearly $31 MILLION in cap space. Even after we tag Josh, we'll have ~$18m.

call me crazy but why do we need to tag Norman if we have $31 million in cap space? sorry I must be missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chknwing said:

call me crazy but why do we need to tag Norman if we have $31 million in cap space? sorry I must be missing something.

Because it's a safer bet.  If he doesn't perform as well next year you aren't stuck with him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, chknwing said:

call me crazy but why do we need to tag Norman if we have $31 million in cap space? sorry I must be missing something.

The market and the determination of worth.

Norman likely is going to want Revis money.  Gettleman is never going to pay Norman Revis money.

Just because you have all the money in the world to spend doesn't mean its wise to OVERspend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

The market and the determination of worth.

Norman likely is going to want Revis money.  Gettleman is never going to pay Norman Revis money.

Just because you have all the money in the world to spend doesn't mean its wise to OVERspend.

tagging him will be revis money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...