Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great idea, Rog...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

NFL begins public campaign to explain the catch rules

Some years back, a company I worked for asked employees to do a survey that rated how well management was doing.

Management at the time was utter crap, and the survey results were absolutely savage.

So in response to this, did they try to comprehend the problems? Did they look at possible changes? Did they seek to get to the heart of the issue? 

No. 

They sent back the survey with an email that basically said "well, maybe you didn't understand the questions".

Likewise, the NFL has now decided that rather than make any actual changes to the catch rule or the way that it's enforced, they're just going to try and explain to everyone why it's okay just as it is.

Oh yeah...Great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Well of course not, they want to be able to say it is or isn't a catch whenever they want.  

How else can the refs determine who will win the game? Ignoring holding, pass interference, and personal fouls might not be enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain?  You can't explain something that no one understands.  When you former head of officials and other in-game analysts just joke about every close call because they know there's no rhyme or reason to it you know you have a problem.  I don't even blame the refs.  The rules are so vague that I don't know how they're supposed to interpret them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Explain?  You can't explain something that no one understands.  When you former head of officials and other in-game analysts just joke about every close call because they know there's no rhyme or reason to it you know you have a problem.  I don't even blame the refs.  The rules are so vague that I don't know how they're supposed to interpret them.

Actually they're too detailed. They just need to simplify it. Go back to ball in hands, 2 feet on ground = catch. The only reason they made the change to the way it is now was to cover up a bad call years ago. They just need to put their pride aside and go back to the way it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Actually they're too detailed. They just need to simplify it. Go back to ball in hands, 2 feet on ground = catch. The only reason they made the change to the way it is now was to cover up a bad call years ago. They just need to put their pride aside and go back to the way it was.

The NFL?

Wouldn't put money on that, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's the current catch rule as defined by blandino via the nfl.

 

1. secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and
2. touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and
3. maintains control of the ball after controlling the ball and touching the ground with both feet or any part of his body other than his hands, until he has clearly become a runner.

 

how would you guys change it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...