Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Voth: CJ open to coming back


Jmac

Recommended Posts

According to Voth on BBR, Johnson wants to test the market first and would be willing to return. So he is looking for more money then D.G was willing to fork over. The man has made MILLONS of dollars from this club and was unwilling to return for the money offered. How many of you would want him back if he decides to take the Gettie figure after testing the market? Or would you rather move on from him and start anew, regardless if he would return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't blame him one bit for testing the market. He hasn't performed up to his pay level here but he will almost certainly get a bigger pay day elsewhere.  Pass rushers usually get overpaid in free agency. 

 

I'd have no problem with him coming back. He is a very good 4-3 end when healthy and also had five sacks in our last two postseasons (one per game average)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jmac said:

According to Voth, Johnson wants to test the market first and would be willing to return. So he is looking for more money then D.G was willing to fork over. The man has made MILLONS of dollars from this club and was unwilling to return for the money offered. How many of you would want him back if he decides to take the Gettie figure after testing the market? Or would you rather move on from him and start anew, regardless if he would return?

First of all, the majority here would take money over the other option, so i don't get the double standard.

I don't blame him wanting to find out his value. 

Stop acting scorned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

First of all, the majority here would take money over the other option, so i don't get the double standard.

I don't blame him wanting to find out his value. 

Stop acting scorned.

The thing I don't get is, we are talking a few millions difference after he's made what 35-50 over the course of his career? At this point, my highest priority would be getting a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

First of all, the majority here would take money over the other option, so i don't get the double standard.

I don't blame him wanting to find out his value. 

Stop acting scorned.

Scorned?  I don't give a shat either way if he comes back or not....just relating what was said on BBR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's obviously damaged goods or else we'd be sitting pretty with having our good old, guaranteed, 10-sack per season Big Money rolling strong on the field.

you can't tell me that we'd let go of a perrinial pro-bowler at a position as crucial to our success as is our DEs.

Its obviously more than just money as to the reasons he got cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now it becomes a numbers game.  Is it worth a couple million extra to him to leave his team? Say Atlanta, or Jax, or whoever with space offers him 8 a year, and the Panthers are offering 5-6...why leave?  Me thinks he might be back unless some team goes stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Now it becomes a numbers game.  Is it worth a couple million extra to him to leave his team? Say Atlanta, or Jax, or whoever with space offers him 8 a year, and the Panthers are offering 5-6...why leave?  Me thinks he might be back unless some team goes stupid. 

His nickname is Big Money...he is going where the cash is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jmac said:

According to Voth on BBR, Johnson wants to test the market first and would be willing to return. So he is looking for more money then D.G was willing to fork over. The man has made MILLONS of dollars from this club and was unwilling to return for the money offered. How many of you would want him back if he decides to take the Gettie figure after testing the market? Or would you rather move on from him and start anew, regardless if he would return?

Good question, Jmac.  I think you have to look forward and not in the past when talking contract.  Hurney used contracts to reward past performance, when only future potential is important.  This was most evident in the Jake Delhomme contract, after Tommy John surgery.  Nobody would have paid half what MH paid him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...