Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oher: To Extend His Contract or Not?


TheNewStandard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, manu4t said:

At the right price, yes we should.  I think he was a relative bargain for what DG got him for, if Matsko thinks he still has room for more improvement, lets lock him up so he doesnt have more leverage with improved play after this year when his current deal is up. If nothing else he is very good depth at the back end of a longer contract (3-4 yrs) if we draft a LT in the next year or two.  No matter what you say about the guy, he was an exponential improvement over Bell.

Agreed. If we can extend his contract at a bargain, I'm all for it. Last year, Tenn paid him a lot more than we did. 4 years would run through 2019. Even if we draft a replacement for him (if Williams already isn't), it will be a few years getting up to speed for the nfl. You cannot draft a plug and play LT picking in the 30's, which is where we live on draft day for the foreseeable future. We need Big Mike as long as he doesn't expect top dollar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Alright Einstein, who do you got in mind to replace Oher without needing a boatload of money? Oher did more than adequate. He was above average (at least in pass protection).

I think that's kind of his M.O.  You'll notice in most threads he just gives a single word response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no reason to extend his contract now, but yes, it would be good to lock him down for at least another 2 years.  

No hurry though, as we got him for this upcoming season for peanuts, and he'll most likely want a decent pay raise (deserves it too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's dependable in pass protection, won't be expensive, has good chemistry with the coaches and his line mates, and most importantly Cam trusts him. 

Slapping a few extra years on his deal is a no-brainer. Worst-case is that he becomes a well-paid RT after we draft/develop his replacement at LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn't a his sack production, it was about his skill set, build, and scheme fit. He's a six foot tall 280 pound DT. He's best used as an interior pass rushing specialist. He can't play the nose in a 3-4 and he doesn't have the length or burst to play he end either. He just wasn't a scheme fit. He'd be a good roster piece as a rotational pass rushing specialist DT to bring in on passing downs in an even defensive front. But you can't hand out a 3 year/$45M contract for that either. Tha type of contract means you have to try to find starter snap numbers for him and that's a problem in a 3-4 front. Hell, it's a problem in a 4-3 front too. That's why the Chiefs were willing to let him walk.
    • Quite a few people argued we way overpaid high end starter money for a guy that was basically a capable backup at best. It was a bad move facilitated by a need to save face after missing out on Williams. It is what it is man. We aren't being paid to carry Dan Morgan's water. It'll be alright.
    • Who else at DT was available coming off a 6.5 sack season, that was relatively affordable?  We took the Milton Williams money and added Turk AND Bobby Brown III. You can't predict soft tissue, and surgery in this case. Part of the business.  
×
×
  • Create New...