Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plain vs Peanut M&Ms


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This twitter post got me thinking...

 

 

What is more disturbing to me here is that they are plain M&Ms. I was unaware anyone older than 6 consumes them. 

 

Peanut M&Ms are clearly the superior product in every way possible. Not only in taste, but also in terms of empty calories. At least peanut M&Ms give you a bit of protein and keep you full longer. 

 

What say you?

 

This is about Peanut vs Regular M&Ms. I am aware there are other candies available. We don't care how cool you are by throwing some random obscure candy out into the conversation. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Love them too. Maybe more than Peanut M&Ms but not as widely available. 

Agree...but some things in life are worth searching for and these are one of them. Almond MMs might be be the greatest candy on Earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osd22 said:

Peanut. However, the Mint M&Ms are my favourite. I'm addicted to them. 

For Valentine's Day they released Strawberry M&Ms , they were horrible, fake strawberry flavor, and I knew the would be, but for always trying new candy research, it had to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...