Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Darryl Williams have a legit shot at replacing Mike Remmers?


IGSaint

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Byron Bell is/was bad. Nate Chandler is/was bad. Mike Remmers is an average player who has performed satisfactorily against almost everyone he's faced, and it's unfortunate for both him and Carolina that they faced arguably the best edge rusher in the NFL in the Super Bowl. Not saying that Remmers is an answer or that Carolina shouldn't look to upgrade, because they should, but calling him bad is incorrect.

get ready to be accused of accepting mediocrity and drinking this penny pinching FO's kool aid and not wanting to win championships and on and on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

get ready to be accused of accepting mediocrity and drinking this penny pinching FO's kool aid and not wanting to win championships and on and on

That Kool-Aid was pretty tasty. I believe I'll have another glass. How about you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

get ready to be accused of accepting mediocrity and drinking this penny pinching FO's kool aid and not wanting to win championships and on and on

As often as not, guys who think they're being edgy and going against the status quo are really just being stupid.

That one's a clear example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, uscgamecocks said:

I'm not sure Daryl Williams is the answer for countering small / speed DEs like Beasley and Miller.  He has very long arms but was in the second percentile among all NFL OTs for lateral agility per his combine results.  By measurables, Remmers should be more agile while Williams much stronger in the run game.

The caveat, of course, is that measurables aren't everything and he'll get his opportunity.  I think he can be a better OT than Remmers but I think he might have the same liability (speed on the edge).

Yep. Williams will struggle with the elite speed rushers too. That was his weakness coming out and weaknesses very rarely become strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The same could be said for several players. We can't replace everyone just because of one bad game, even though it was the superb owl.

He also choked in the regular season too and I predicted he would be a huge reason why we would fail in the postseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IGSaint said:

He also choked in the regular season too and I predicted he would be a huge reason why we would fail in the postseason. 

Gettleman pointed out that the team is like 24-4 with him on the field, and if you're referring to the Atlanta game few players looked good that day.

Again, I'm not saying that the team shouldn't look for an upgrade/give Williams a genuine shot and I'm sure that the FO and staff are acutely aware of the vulnerability to true speed, but Remmers is far from bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah remmers was clearly our worst offensive lineman last season and odds are he's going to have the fight of his life on his hands in training camp.  which is the way it should be.

he's not horrible.  the rest of the line consists of two pro bowlers one of which is possibly the best center in the league, a very promising guard that's still developing, and michael oher turning in a performance that put him in the top half of the league as a pass blocking tackle.  if we released mike remmers today his phone would be ringing and he'd be signed on as a presumptive starter somewhere pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remmers is a serviceable vet that will eventually become solid/very good depth at a position that requires it.

Daryl Williams has a shot at not only becoming the starting RT but if he continues to impress, hs an outside chance at LT as well.

I am very excited to see what this guy can do beside either a Turner or Norwell.  That's a whole lot of beef right there gents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Byron Bell is/was bad. Nate Chandler is/was bad. Mike Remmers is an average player who has performed satisfactorily against almost everyone he's faced, and it's unfortunate for both him and Carolina that they faced arguably the best edge rusher in the NFL in the Super Bowl. Not saying that Remmers is an answer or that Carolina shouldn't look to upgrade, because they should, but calling him bad is incorrect.

Again, being ranked at the bottom four of starters at your position isn't "satisfactory" nor is it "admirable" or "a solid job" or "other stupid cliche used to build up a bad player because he has a panther logo on his helmet"

 

He is a bad football player. This isn't a case of "yeah maybe we could do better" its a case of "we absolutely should find someone better"

 

The narrative that he is a"a solid football player, broes" needs to go away as quickly as possible before we get sucked into having this bad football player starting for our team for an extended period of time, costing us more games single handedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

finding someone who is even an average pass blocker is hard.  finding a guy who can do it at a high level consistently is really, really difficult and unless you're doing it through the draft it's not cheap.

on a related note, does anyone remember the furor on this site after 2014 when there were so many people banging pots and pans over the panthers not even targeting james hurst as an UDFA?  well he was kind of one of the worst tackles in football last season, so that's why nobody is talking about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

Again, being ranked at the bottom four of starters at your position isn't "satisfactory" nor is it "admirable" or "a solid job" or "other stupid cliche used to build up a bad player because he has a panther logo on his helmet"

 

He is a bad football player. This isn't a case of "yeah maybe we could do better" its a case of "we absolutely should find someone better"

 

The narrative that he is a"a solid football player, broes" needs to go away as quickly as possible before we get sucked into having this bad football player starting for our team for an extended period of time, costing us more games single handedly.

By what metric was Remmers ranked in the bottom 4 of starters at RT? He was middle of the pack by PFF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...