Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers rescind Norman's franchise tag...


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

Well fug I did not see that coming, I gotta stand behind Don Gettleman though. The Panthers got other priorities besides playing chicken especially with the Draft in less than a week. This will free up more space on the salary cap now.

So long Josh it was nice having you line up for the Panthers, you quickly became one of my favorites. I hope he gets his big payday just won't be with Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Sorry but this is astronomically stupid. When You have a team that is built to win a Super Bowl TODAY you don't go telling a game-changing, Top 5 shutdown corner to kick rocks. 

Gettleman can be the alpha dog all he wants, but you can't let your pride get in the way when dealing with a player you can't afford to lose. For anyone saying no one player is more important than the team, go watch some games of Antoine Cason and remind yourself what our defense looked like before Norman was the starter

And that was w Hardy beefing the rush

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zacka77ack said:

I like this move. You wanna play here?  Sign your tender. Otherwise go talk a big game elsewhere.

This is pretty much my sentiment. Guy clearly never gave a sht about the team, only himself. Go play somewhere else and watch us next February from a couch. Dick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...