Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3/3-4 hybrid


ncfan

Recommended Posts

This isn't a sign where we are with KK's contract is it?

I don't see us drafting Butler in the first to be a sub for 5 years.

We've seen KK slide out at end, also Butler's comparison is Muhammed Wilkerson who is a 3-4 DE for the jets. 

May be a dumb question considering our D has been been pretty good the last 3 seasons so why adjust it.  But could we see us sliding to a hybrid style D with Ealy, Star, Butler, and KK being the DL.  Understand the bpa, but unsure we'd use it on a guy playing the same position we are signing long term unless we are adjusting down the the getting both in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but it did seem that Gettleman really wanted to try to resign both KK and Star. Butler has been said to able to play all the positions on the line. Gettleman has said big guys make you compete.  We have also signed Soliali who is a backup NT and Love who is a backup UT.  With the big guys help you compete and his versatility I just see us going with a 4-3DE, NT, UT, 3-4 DE (Ealy, Star, KK, Butler) lineup.  Its a matchup nightmare considering we are getting hybrid style LB's like Shaq who can drop back, blitz, cover RBs in space etc.  

Especially if we do hold onto KK and Star. You just don't draft a guy in the first who's going to be a backup more than a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how the title relates to the post but the first thing I thought was how good a 3-4 front line butler -star - short would make, especially with some of the faster, slimmer DEs we have on the roster in delaire, cox, miles and Addison.

would not be surprised if we threw some looks like:

           Butler/ealy-star-short/cj

CJ/delaire/cox                        TD/Shaq/Addison 

 

i know now it's not something we can sustain if teams put multiple TEs/slot looks, but it's exactly the sort of curveball you could throw in to keep teams on their toes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered last night if we might try this. It's how the Seattle style defenses run even though they are a 4-3 under they are very similar to a 3-4 personnel wise. Standard NT and UT(3 tech) with one DE who is on the bigger run stuffing side(this could be Butler) and plays similar to a 5 tech in a 3-4 then a pure pass rushing DE opposite him which is like the designated pass rushing OLB in a 3-4. Seattle themselves don't run that style much anymore now that they have two great DEs in Bennett and Avril but when they lacked the DE personnel and had stronger interior personnel this is what they ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Mississippi State had 93 total rushing yards that game. Their season average was 144 ypg. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, joemac said:

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Yeah I get that but we just signed 2 Solid guys this off season for that purpose in Soliali and Love. We also keep talking about resigning both DT's long term.  You don't draft guy in the 1st to be a rotation player for 5 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rags said:

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Kind of like how Rivera and Gettleman based their choice on the Senior Bowl film they just watched this past week. Listen to the presser. They tell you his college tape is unimpressive and this decision was based on the Senior Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
    • Yeah, this is all projections of how it will turn out. Inevitability this list will look ridiculous in a full 2025 sesson hindsight, most likely. Still, I am pretty surprised that so many bristled at being thought of as having very, very lowly ranked WR and TE units. We literally have been for years. All you have to do is just have things stay the same and those are immediately bottom 5 units. It is easy to see why one would be reticent to have lofty expectations in the preseason. Gotta show it first when you are a perennial cellar dweller. That's just life at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...