Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3/3-4 hybrid


ncfan

Recommended Posts

This isn't a sign where we are with KK's contract is it?

I don't see us drafting Butler in the first to be a sub for 5 years.

We've seen KK slide out at end, also Butler's comparison is Muhammed Wilkerson who is a 3-4 DE for the jets. 

May be a dumb question considering our D has been been pretty good the last 3 seasons so why adjust it.  But could we see us sliding to a hybrid style D with Ealy, Star, Butler, and KK being the DL.  Understand the bpa, but unsure we'd use it on a guy playing the same position we are signing long term unless we are adjusting down the the getting both in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but it did seem that Gettleman really wanted to try to resign both KK and Star. Butler has been said to able to play all the positions on the line. Gettleman has said big guys make you compete.  We have also signed Soliali who is a backup NT and Love who is a backup UT.  With the big guys help you compete and his versatility I just see us going with a 4-3DE, NT, UT, 3-4 DE (Ealy, Star, KK, Butler) lineup.  Its a matchup nightmare considering we are getting hybrid style LB's like Shaq who can drop back, blitz, cover RBs in space etc.  

Especially if we do hold onto KK and Star. You just don't draft a guy in the first who's going to be a backup more than a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how the title relates to the post but the first thing I thought was how good a 3-4 front line butler -star - short would make, especially with some of the faster, slimmer DEs we have on the roster in delaire, cox, miles and Addison.

would not be surprised if we threw some looks like:

           Butler/ealy-star-short/cj

CJ/delaire/cox                        TD/Shaq/Addison 

 

i know now it's not something we can sustain if teams put multiple TEs/slot looks, but it's exactly the sort of curveball you could throw in to keep teams on their toes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered last night if we might try this. It's how the Seattle style defenses run even though they are a 4-3 under they are very similar to a 3-4 personnel wise. Standard NT and UT(3 tech) with one DE who is on the bigger run stuffing side(this could be Butler) and plays similar to a 5 tech in a 3-4 then a pure pass rushing DE opposite him which is like the designated pass rushing OLB in a 3-4. Seattle themselves don't run that style much anymore now that they have two great DEs in Bennett and Avril but when they lacked the DE personnel and had stronger interior personnel this is what they ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Mississippi State had 93 total rushing yards that game. Their season average was 144 ypg. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, joemac said:

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Yeah I get that but we just signed 2 Solid guys this off season for that purpose in Soliali and Love. We also keep talking about resigning both DT's long term.  You don't draft guy in the 1st to be a rotation player for 5 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rags said:

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Kind of like how Rivera and Gettleman based their choice on the Senior Bowl film they just watched this past week. Listen to the presser. They tell you his college tape is unimpressive and this decision was based on the Senior Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...