Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trai Turner interview on NFL Network


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

Honestly would be ok with extending him now and overpaying currently, before the cap jump and guards start making even more money. In fact, this could be expanded to a bunch of different players. It would be wise to extend a lot of our young guys now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trai let it be known how the players took the loss of Norman. It was a "huge" loss. The disgust/disappointment for the front offices decision was written all over his face - not to mention the voice inflection.

These young players have been put on notice that this is a 'business' first, and they will be going after truck loads of guaranteed money. No team discounts from any of them. They looked up to Norman and fed off him.

I doubt Gettleman gives any of them their market value in guaranteed money. The players at the top of their position will all go elsewhere. Expect Gettleman to draft their HOPEFUL replacements just like Vernon Butler and the CBs this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Huddler said:

What did jamie say about malpractice? Now and in the past?

Well it was the past I'm just, admittedly, bad with holding grudges Haha but before 2014 he accused Gman of "GM Malpractice" with regards to the state of our secondary and Oline and went as far as to suggest Cam would should leave if a GM wasn't willing to surround him with talent. He may have had a point with the Oline which was horrendous until the later part of the year but we still won the division and got a playoff win. Haven't really much cared for him sense, maybe I'm being childish 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Trai let it be known how the players took the loss of Norman. It was a "huge" loss. The disgust/disappointment for the front offices decision was written all over his face - not to mention the voice inflection.

These young players have been put on notice that this is a 'business' first, and they will be going after truck loads of guaranteed money. No team discounts from any of them. They looked up to Norman and fed off him.

I doubt Gettleman gives any of them their market value in guaranteed money. The players at the top of their position will all go elsewhere. Expect Gettleman to draft their HOPEFUL replacements just like Vernon Butler and the CBs this year.

They looked up to norman and not guys like olsen, cam, luke, TD?  All have team friendly contracts.

GTFO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Trai let it be known how the players took the loss of Norman. It was a "huge" loss. The disgust/disappointment for the front offices decision was written all over his face - not to mention the voice inflection.

These young players have been put on notice that this is a 'business' first, and they will be going after truck loads of guaranteed money. No team discounts from any of them. They looked up to Norman and fed off him.

I doubt Gettleman gives any of them their market value in guaranteed money. The players at the top of their position will all go elsewhere. Expect Gettleman to draft their HOPEFUL replacements just like Vernon Butler and the CBs this year.

you're like that guy in like every movie that always gets killed off early on.

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Trai let it be known how the players took the loss of Norman. It was a "huge" loss. The disgust/disappointment for the front offices decision was written all over his face - not to mention the voice inflection.

You're seeing what you want to see.  Some disappointment, surprise maybe.  Disgust.  I didn't see it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stbugs said:

I hope I have the time to flush out what I posted in another thread about all of the upcoming FAs, but I'd think Turner will get $10M per year and Norwell in the $7M range. Maybe we can get Norwell cheaper. I think he's good, but I am not sure he is a top 10 guard like Turner is top 5. I'd like to extend both, period.

This is also where the KK stuff is interesting. Would you rather have Turner + Norwell or KK? That's going to be a decision to make, especially if Boston or Ealy or Coleman or Benjamin or Star or maybe even Johnson or maybe all of them have solid seasons. They are all up for contracts very soon and KK at Cox money will mean we likely couldn't sign a couple of them. Short is 27. Star is 26, Turner is 23, Norwell is 24, Benjamin is 25, Boston is 24 and Ealy is 24. Maybe franchising Short and not signing him long term is smart.

There in lies the issue, while I LOVE Norwell I think he is more a solid Guard who beat the odds and is producing at a higher level than anyone could have expected as opposed to just a top 10 stud player. We as fans tend to value that more than GMs in charge of millions of dollars. He has earned job security in the 5 to 6 mill a year Range. 

If it were me I'd rather lock him and Trai up and keep our 100mill $ stud upright than hamstring the cap to meet market value on KK. We've seen what Cam can do from the pocket with protection, so that should always be priority numero uno! 

Also like you pointed out we are more than likely gonna have to fork out a sizable amount to KB eventually, Star is gonna get his, I definitely do not envy GMan...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

They looked up to norman and not guys like olsen, cam, luke, TD?  All have team friendly contracts.

GTFO.

 

norman was basically the glue that held the team together obviously

what looked like so called "leaders" like TD and luke bitching him out and holding him back and trying to talk him out of drawing a 15 yarder every week was actually them asking him what to do on the next play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...