Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera clears up running back speculation..


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Ron Rivera cleared up any speculation on the running backs today. 

 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/2016/08/09/carolina-panthers-positional-update-running-backs/

 

in short, Stew, Tolbert, Fozzy are locks. 

Wegher and CAP are in direct competition for that third spot

Rivera doesn't mince words here. He means this. You can take it as fact. 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

I know the Panthers love Fozz, but if you think both Wegher and CAP will turn out to be great players- you have to move on from Fozz and keep both 

I'm not saying I don't agree, I am just saying Rivera means it when he says Fozzy and Tolbert are the second string backs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

We kept all of them on the final roster last year - don't see the big deal:

RB - Stew, Fozzy, Cap, Weg
FB - Tolbert

I'd like to see 'em all back again too. IMO the jury is still out on Cap and Wegher, and nothing wrong with good RB depth. These guys get hit a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's motivational but the coaches seem to always side with vets.

CAP's issue is ball security. Idk how that's looking in practice but it's a surefire way to hold himself back.

I just go back to the Giants game when all three were healthy. Tolbert had 5 touches, Fozzy had 4 and CAP had 16

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the panthers like Fozzy im sure he has good intangibles but honestly I think he is capped out as far as potential and less talented than any other back on the roster, in fact he should have been cut last year for Todman. that said im just a fan with a computer,  I dont coach at any level so he can always prove me wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, stbugs said:

CAP had the most touches the last 3 games without Stewart by a good margin. Again, I think it makes sense to call Fozzie/Tolbert as the #2 to Stewart because when he was healthy, it was just those 3 active. I also think that if Stewart goes down, Fozzie/Tolbert don't become the #1, I think CAP (or Wegher) would move into the #1. What RR said was absolutely true, but that doesn't mean he considers them the #1 when Stewart is inactive.

Fozzy did start vs Atlanta before he got hurt but I think you're reasoning is right and I think it makes sense. Ron seems to see the #2 RB as a position with different responsibilities than the #1.

I still don't want to see 90% of the handoffs  go to Stewart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...