Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera clears up running back speculation..


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Ron Rivera cleared up any speculation on the running backs today. 

 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/2016/08/09/carolina-panthers-positional-update-running-backs/

 

in short, Stew, Tolbert, Fozzy are locks. 

Wegher and CAP are in direct competition for that third spot

Rivera doesn't mince words here. He means this. You can take it as fact. 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

I know the Panthers love Fozz, but if you think both Wegher and CAP will turn out to be great players- you have to move on from Fozz and keep both 

I'm not saying I don't agree, I am just saying Rivera means it when he says Fozzy and Tolbert are the second string backs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

We kept all of them on the final roster last year - don't see the big deal:

RB - Stew, Fozzy, Cap, Weg
FB - Tolbert

I'd like to see 'em all back again too. IMO the jury is still out on Cap and Wegher, and nothing wrong with good RB depth. These guys get hit a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's motivational but the coaches seem to always side with vets.

CAP's issue is ball security. Idk how that's looking in practice but it's a surefire way to hold himself back.

I just go back to the Giants game when all three were healthy. Tolbert had 5 touches, Fozzy had 4 and CAP had 16

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the panthers like Fozzy im sure he has good intangibles but honestly I think he is capped out as far as potential and less talented than any other back on the roster, in fact he should have been cut last year for Todman. that said im just a fan with a computer,  I dont coach at any level so he can always prove me wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, stbugs said:

CAP had the most touches the last 3 games without Stewart by a good margin. Again, I think it makes sense to call Fozzie/Tolbert as the #2 to Stewart because when he was healthy, it was just those 3 active. I also think that if Stewart goes down, Fozzie/Tolbert don't become the #1, I think CAP (or Wegher) would move into the #1. What RR said was absolutely true, but that doesn't mean he considers them the #1 when Stewart is inactive.

Fozzy did start vs Atlanta before he got hurt but I think you're reasoning is right and I think it makes sense. Ron seems to see the #2 RB as a position with different responsibilities than the #1.

I still don't want to see 90% of the handoffs  go to Stewart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...