Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

18k fine for hit on Cam


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

Denver Broncos safety Darian Stewart has been fined $18,231 by the NFL for his helmet-to-helmet hit to Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton in Week 1, a source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Caplan on Wednesday.

 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/17545275/denver-broncos-safety-darian-stewart-fined-hit-carolina-panthers-qb-cam-newton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine should also be on refs. A fine given for a hit/infraction where a ref stood right there and didnt throw a flag is a breakdown in the system. Just cant reconcile how such occured and a fine was given out, but just crickets in regards to the refs that let it happen. And no...personal fouls with helmet to helmet hits FAR  outweigh any other penalty and should not " offset"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All about the posture!                    If Cam is in the pocket.............in the process of throwing the ball,  that bastard better not bend his knees,  or lower his head in any way or anything else associated with a rb posture.

.........apparently,  within the pocket,  qbs lose all of their protections,  if a qb even hints at a RB posture.  lol. 

lol...  qbs change postures multiple times in an instant,  during any given snap.    but sure,  let us use posture as the ultimate tool when determining a dirty hit/flag.  ......but..........lets use it only against Cam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AppHeel said:

NFL commits $100M to player safety due to the fallout of the hits on Cam Newton's Head.

Darian Stewart gets fined $18,231 for his direct hit on Cam Newton's head because it jeopardizes player safety.

How does that add up at all?

The Commissioners bank account was getting low, he needed some play money, cleverly disguised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scenario: Team A is down by 3 with 1:00 left in the 4Q against Team B. Team A's quarterback has the ball on his own 30 after completing a decisive, accurate 10-yard strike. Team B sends a blitzing safety who leaves his feet to launch the crown of his helmet into Team A QB's earhole. The independent doctor places Team A QB in the concussion protocol. The reserve QB is forced to finish the game fresh off the bench and proves ineffective. Team B wins.

The NFL has made it loud and clear that this is an acceptable tactic. With an admitted history of playing dirty to win the game (see: SB50, Talib), is it that far fetched that this was Darian Stewart's intent? Today he will get a fine that he'll hardly notice, a price he will gladly pay for a W. The NFL wants to trumpet player safety and pretend concussions aren't an issue? SUSPEND players that resort to these bushleague antics.

At least the Broncos are in the minority, and many teams have the integrity to play within the rules and respect the safety of players on other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...