Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Turnovers


t96

Recommended Posts

Huge part of why we're 1-5 that hasn't really been touched upon much.

Our turnover differential this year is -8, or 2nd last in the league. We have just 8 takeaways on defense tied with 6 other teams for 16th in the league. We've turned the ball over 16 times on offense/special teams, for 2nd most in the league. Both of these are a huge issue.

Last year we were +20, good for first in the league by a margin of 6. We had 39 takeaways, the most in the league, and just 19 giveaways, tied for 8th best. 

We're on pace for about 21 takeaways and 43 giveaways, which would be a -22 differential. That's a difference of 42 turnovers from last year to this year.

Hopefully this has been an emphasis over the bye and will be fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

I think this goes hand in hand with not getting any pressure on the QB.

Yep. A large portion(I want to say majority but I have zero stats to back this up) of turnovers come from strip sacks or interceptions on a rushed throw to avoid pressure. NFL QB's don't often make stupid throws if they are allowed to sit there without any pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turnover differential is a fickle thing. To a certain extent, we can control that number by taking care of the ball better on offense and creating more opportunities on the defense.

Unfortunately, luck plays a factor as well such as fumbles that we can't recover or passes that get tipped and it gets picked off. That fumble last season that Dickson scored on against the Bucs is something that only would've happened last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, outlaw4 said:

Turnover differential is a fickle thing. To a certain extent, we can control that number by taking care of the ball better on offense and creating more opportunities on the defense.

Unfortunately, luck plays a factor as well such as fumbles that we can't recover or passes that get tipped and it gets picked off. That fumble last season that Dickson scored on against the Bucs is something that only would've happened last season.

Luck can be a small factor on fumble recoveries but not on interceptions or the actual act of fumbling the ball.

If a ball is tipped and picked it's the QBs fault for letting it get tipped by a defender. If it's off the receiver's hands it's on the receiver, or possibly QB if it's too hard of a throw and just out of reach for the receiver. No interception is ever being unlucky. A QB's stats may be unlucky if his receivers tip a lot of balls ending up in picks like Cam has had a bit of the last few years, but that's not unlucky for the team, just the QB's stats.

On the act of fumbling, any time a player fumbles it's his fault for not protecting the ball. It's never being unlucky. And a team who's disciplined at going for the football on D will have more forced fumbles than other teams who aren't disciplined or skilled at going for strips. It's not luck. The only thing that's luck is the way it bounces once it's actually lost, and that's very minimal.

I'd say turnovers are about 1% luck, if that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have touched on this several times.

The Panthers are on pace to set a record franchise low in defensive takeaways, and a record franchise high in turnovers.

What compounds this even more is the Panthers D gave up 1 TD and forced 2 turnovers following team turnovers last season. They have given up 3 TDs and forced 0 turnovers this season.

The turnovers by the offense are not the major issue. You can expect an offense to turn the ball over 20 to 30 times per season. It is when an offense is forced to play from behind that the turnovers get to 30+.

The defense must effectively keep opponents from scoring TDs following a turnover and force some turnovers to counter the opposing teams defense. Turnover margin is 80% defense and 20% offense.

The secondary is not forcing their share of turnovers or scoring TDs like last season. The Panthers secondary last season combined for 15 interceptions and 7 forced fumbles. The secondary this season is on pace for 12 interceptions and 0 forced fumbles. They are clearly not attacking the ball this season.

That is your problem. Has nothing to do with sacks. The sacks last season came because QBs were forced to hold the ball and move around in the pocket to find an open receiver. KK did not get 11 sacks by getting to the QB in under 3 seconds. This season it is a 3 step drop and the ball is out. Way too easy for QBs. I doubt QBs are holding the ball longer than 3 seconds. I know they are not having to move around in the pocket much due to coverage. Their receivers seem to be open very quickly.

It would be interesting to know what the opposing QBs average release time is against the Panthers secondary last season versus this season. That will likely pin point the problem you are looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

I have touched on this several times.

The Panthers are on pace to set a record franchise low in defensive takeaways, and a record franchise high in turnovers.

What compounds this even more is the Panthers D gave up 1 TD and forced 2 turnovers following team turnovers last season. They have given up 3 TDs and forced 0 turnovers this season.

The turnovers by the offense are not the major issue. You can expect an offense to turn the ball over 20 to 30 times per season. It is when an offense is forced to play from behind that the turnovers get to 30+.

The defense must effectively keep opponents from scoring TDs following a turnover and force some turnovers to counter the opposing teams defense. Turnover margin is 80% defense and 20% offense.

The secondary is not forcing their share of turnovers or scoring TDs like last season. The Panthers secondary last season combined for 15 interceptions and 7 forced fumbles. The secondary this season is on pace for 12 interceptions and 0 forced fumbles. They are clearly not attacking the ball this season.

That is your problem. Has nothing to do with sacks. The sacks last season came because QBs were forced to hold the ball and move around in the pocket to find an open receiver. KK did not get 11 sacks by getting to the QB in under 3 seconds. This season it is a 3 step drop and the ball is out. Way too easy for QBs. I doubt QBs are holding the ball longer than 3 seconds. I know they are not having to move around in the pocket much due to coverage. Their receivers seem to be open very quickly.

It would be interesting to know what the opposing QBs average release time is against the Panthers secondary last season versus this season. That will likely pin point the problem you are looking for.

 

If you find you are repeating yourself. Maybe you should rethink your delivery? You could try exploring different ways to better connect with your target audience. I mean, there must be a reason you are having to address topics over and over?

 

Now please don't take this the wrong way. What happens if the QB release time between last year, and this year, is minimal? That will do nothing to pin point the problem. Then we are stuck right back here in wtf? land. We don't need/want that. We demand answers up in here. Pin point the problem, and let's fix it. That's the Merican way.

 

What if QBs are getting rid of the ball earlier this year? Does that mean they are afraid of our pass rush? Or if the release time is longer. Does that mean the DBs are covering well, and the QB is having to wait for WRs to get open?

 

Point being. Lots goes into how long it takes the QB to release the pass. I am not sure it can be used as an accurate barometer to gauge where the problem lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Huge part of why we're 1-5 that hasn't really been touched upon much.

Our turnover differential this year is -8, or 2nd last in the league. We have just 8 takeaways on defense tied with 6 other teams for 16th in the league. We've turned the ball over 16 times on offense/special teams, for 2nd most in the league. Both of these are a huge issue.

Last year we were +20, good for first in the league by a margin of 6. We had 39 takeaways, the most in the league, and just 19 giveaways, tied for 8th best. 

We're on pace for about 21 takeaways and 43 giveaways, which would be a -22 differential. That's a difference of 42 turnovers from last year to this year.

Hopefully this has been an emphasis over the bye and will be fixed.

One thing that might fix it is to get  Kurt Coleman back into his native position. He was a key part of that equation last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Luck can be a small factor on fumble recoveries but not on interceptions or the actual act of fumbling the ball.

If a ball is tipped and picked it's the QBs fault for letting it get tipped by a defender. If it's off the receiver's hands it's on the receiver, or possibly QB if it's too hard of a throw and just out of reach for the receiver. No interception is ever being unlucky. A QB's stats may be unlucky if his receivers tip a lot of balls ending up in picks like Cam has had a bit of the last few years, but that's not unlucky for the team, just the QB's stats.

On the act of fumbling, any time a player fumbles it's his fault for not protecting the ball. It's never being unlucky. And a team who's disciplined at going for the football on D will have more forced fumbles than other teams who aren't disciplined or skilled at going for strips. It's not luck. The only thing that's luck is the way it bounces once it's actually lost, and that's very minimal.

I'd say turnovers are about 1% luck, if that.

I'd say it's a higher percentage than that. I still remember how Russell Wilson had this long streak of fumbling the ball and yet finding ways to keep possession. On the flip side, someone can practice tip drills all day but trajectory is dictated by small margins. One day, they shoot upwards for an easy pick. The next, the receiver finds a way to catch it anyways.

Long story short, I wasn't expecting us to match our turnovers from last season. Didn't expect this much of a swing, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...