Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where is the high comp.% passing game??


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

As I watch other games I see other teams use the short high completion % passing game to success...

Something we don't do and I wonder the reason..

And what I mean by high completion % passing . . Is screens, dump offs, and roll out..

1. Is it Cam fault not being able to be more accurate with short passes.. Is he not.seeing the dump off option enough..

2. Is it Shula not being able to call a diverse passing attack like he does with running the ball..

3. Is it the talent at RB and WR . We have fast and quick WR'S ..Why not more smoke screens?

We have Tolbert and Fozzy why not more roll outs and Screens with them lined up out the backfield??

I think we have the weapons to have a killer short passing game and I don't understand why we don't utilize this in our offense . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the Eagles play calling was absolutely cowardly tonight and they deserved to lose because of it.  Went threw 40+ times but still for under 200 yards because they were all screens and short routes.  I'd rather my QB throw 55% but hit on a few big plays then do whatever the hell the Eagles tried to do on offense tonight.  A good mix is most important though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's our system and Cam's strengths. The Air Coryell system doesn't yield a high completion percentage and a lot of short passes like the west coast that a lot of teams run. Which is completely fine, they're just different systems. We attack vertically, the other offenses attack horizontally. I like the vertical passing game better to be honest, and Cam fits it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the Eagles play calling was absolutely cowardly tonight and they deserved to lose because of it.  Went threw 40+ times but still for under 200 yards because they were all screens and short routes.  I'd rather my QB throw 55% but hit on a few big plays then do whatever the hell the Eagles tried to do on offense tonight.  A good mix is most important though

Or you could be balanced , have to take advantage of Fozzy & Phillys skill set

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...