Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D...the front 4


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

  

Quote

He [Carson Palmer]was pressured a season-high 20 times by the Panthers, according to ESPN Stats & Information. ......... And of the Panthers' pressures, 13 of them -- resulting in five sacks -- were by four or fewer pass rushers.

It's about time!!!  Very happy about this.

 

 

  

Quote

 

It would've been one thing had the Carolina Panthersunveiled new, unique schemes Sunday to sack Arizona Cardinals quarterback Carson Palmer eight times.

But they didn't.

The Cardinals' offensive line knew what was coming and couldn't stop it in a 30-20 loss at Bank of America Stadium.

"We practiced everything they threw at us," center A.Q. Shipley said. "I don't think they really threw anything different at us. We just weren't good enough today."

 

Finally got our D back.  Hope they stick around.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/arizona-cardinals/post/_/id/23042/cardinals-need-to-protect-carson-palmer-to-get-back-to-winning-ways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Lemory said:

I noticed the DE's were doing a lot more twists and slants yesterday. That may have been something that helped out. 

Yes it did. This game I have seen more twist and stunts then any other game . Ron talked about adjusting during the bye. Hopefully we can keep on making adjustments and win out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either this thread took an unexpected turn or I'm reading it as my 15 year old self.

Regardless, on the one hand I'm still a little bugged hearing opposing players say they're "not seeing anything different" from us, but I can't really complain much seeing as it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Either this thread took an unexpected turn or I'm reading it as my 15 year old self.

Regardless, on the one hand I'm still a little bugged hearing opposing players say they're "not seeing anything different" from us, but I can't really complain much seeing as it worked.

They feel better saying they beat themselves than giving credit where it's due. Players do this all the time and we as fans did it in losses last year. Whether it's true or not, I don't know. But what I do know is I did see some different things that we did in the pass rush, but that's just my untrained eye. Thought I saw more nickel blitzes than before which were paying off with LJ having 2 sacks with 1 called back because of a questionable call. Also did see some different stunts on the DL as others have alluded to here. Though I just may not have noticed it in the other games because we weren't getting pressure so we weren't seeing replays of the DL as much. Haven't been watching NFL Game Rewind since our loss to the Vikings but I'll probably start watching the all-22 again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

They feel better saying they beat themselves than giving credit where it's due. Players do this all the time and we as fans did it in losses last year. Whether it's true or not, I don't know. But what I do know is I did see some different things that we did in the pass rush, but that's just my untrained eye. Thought I saw more nickel blitzes than before which were paying off with LJ having 2 sacks with 1 called back because of a questionable call. Also did see some different stunts on the DL as others have alluded to here. Though I just may not have noticed it in the other games because we weren't getting pressure so we weren't seeing replays of the DL as much. Haven't been watching NFL Game Rewind since our loss to the Vikings but I'll probably start watching the all-22 again.

I get that, but what makes it more credible to me is that this isn't the first time we've heard that.

Throw in that the last time we heard this it came from a team that beat us, so there were no excuses needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I get that, but what makes it more credible to me is that this isn't the first time we've heard that.

Throw in that the last time we heard this it came from a team that beat us, so there were no excuses needed.

Well if it's a common thing for players to do, we'd hear it multiple times from multiple teams.

Of course you're talking about the Broncos' comments after beating us but that honestly isn't so concerning because what we had been doing had worked all year and didn't need changing. We could've beaten them without adjusting if we just had better production from our players and if Stew didn't get hurt and other things that just didn't bounce our way. I don't think we got outcoached that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...