Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

National Headline Tomorrow: "Cam Chokes"


MGH1989

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Panthers aren't making a single national headline.

The headline is "Carr overcomes dislocated finger on throwing hand to lead 4th quarter comeback. MVP?"

You underestimate how many people in the media are getting boners at the thought of shitting on Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MGH1989 said:

Guess it's easier to write that than "o-line sucks, Greg Olsen drops two huge passes, coaching staff is trash."

Current articles are blaming Rivera for not going for it. However the headline is about the Raiders. 4-7 teams don't get headlines for losing to 9-2 teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MGH1989 said:

You underestimate how many people in the media are getting boners at the thought of shitting on Cam.

Yep, media doesn't give a poo about talking about 4th string centers and what not....that doesn't generate clicks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam will get the blame, as he always does. He's the Carolina Scapegoat. Nobody will talk about how he scored 25 points to lead the comeback. Rivera is the one who choked, but nobody will write or mention that. The o-line is bad, but nobody will write that. Nobody will write how Ron and shula had their tales tucked between their legs on 4th and 1. It'll all be Cam's fault in the morning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That can be a chicken or the egg scenario. Canales knows what the QB is good at and is not good at better than we do.  He would have reasons for not calling deep shots, if he is holding back. They could include protection concerns, as well as any Young related motivations.  I think there always the chance Bryce doesn’t see the man open down the field and it is just that simple, more than a confidence issue. Probably a mix of the two.   
    • This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC.  You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract.    But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 
    • No team hits on every pick.  Every coach and GM will eventually get fired.   We are a better team and have greatly increased the talent on the roster. Bad GMs lead to losses.   I love the teams current setup in the front office and the process in how we look at talent and coaching.  Canales has often said we want to have a player developmental philosophy as a core tenant.  I love that combined with cutting edge analytics and good football knowledge and experience.
×
×
  • Create New...