Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Leonard Johnson - Keep him or let him walk?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

Leonard Johnson was only signed for one year. Is a UFA in 2017.

To me, it seems like the defense improved with him on the field. I say keep him. I can't see any team beating down his door with a big contract.

 

 

IMO, it is not a coinky dinky that the whole Defense started gelling when both he, and Bradberry starting playing together.

 

So I say, you gots to keep him. AND, I am of the belief that other teams have noticed his play as well. So if we let him hit the streets, we may not get him back. Sign him, cuz you know, continuity.

 

What that contract must be to keep him? That is a good/scary question.

 

And he has earned it. But like teh @Jangler said. Does he want to be here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ESPN’s recent grades has Charlotte with a B. I haven’t paid attention to any others really. 
    • It’s simple. Win and everyone in here will say the culture is good. Dear lord the amount of time spent on these posts is hysterical. We’ve seen the end of season swoons where you can tell the team had given up with many of the same leaders that took us to playoff seasons. When your OL is decimated by injuries, it’s amazing how fast culture turns. When you get on a tear like 2015, everyone’s having fun. You need the right people regardless, but they have to win.
    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
×
×
  • Create New...