Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has a NFL team ever been first in sacks, last in pass defense?


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

As long as you can rush the passer, you can put literally anybody back there and be great. Its just get system.

 

 

#Dave

We have been getting killed by screens and swing passes this season, nothing our pass rush can do against that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I am pretty sure that was a sarcastic/tongue in cheek comment.

Forerunner types with his tongue inside his own buttcheek, which is the reasoning behind literally everything else he has ever posted sounding like it was posted by a 9 year old version of pantherclaw on meth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is more than being able to cover WRs. We've struggled against covering RBs and TEs. We have a lot to clean up in the secondary regardless of talent. The zone cover scheme needs to be reevaluated as good offenses has shredded it's flaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ken said:

This is more than being able to cover WRs. We've struggled against covering RBs and TEs. We have a lot to clean up in the secondary regardless of talent. The zone cover scheme needs to be reevaluated as good offenses has shredded it's flaws.

Lol.....that maybe too much to ask from Rivera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ken said:

This is more than being able to cover WRs. We've struggled against covering RBs and TEs. We have a lot to clean up in the secondary regardless of talent. The zone cover scheme needs to be reevaluated as good offenses has shredded it's flaws.

We have to run zone because corners can't cover straight up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...