Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why we won't draft Offense in 1st Round


Catufb85

Recommended Posts

Although tons of mock drafts have us selecting Fournette or even Dalvin Cook at pick number 8 in next years draft.  With Gettleman's BPA and defensive philosophy I would almost bet we don't go offense in the draft.  Now this is all speculation because we haven't had even the last college game, combine, pro days, etc.  But just thinking of the resumes at hand and with more and more players declaring for the NFL draft with the college season coming to an end, even though I think Fournette or my pick Dalvin Cook at number 8, just doesn't seem like a reality at least to me. Heres why: TOO MUCH defensive talent in a very deep draft.  Top Defensive prospect that will most likely be available at 8

SS Jamal Adams

DE Derek Barnett

SS Malik Hooker (recently declared)

DE Jonathan Allen

S Jabrill Peppers

DE Carl Lawson.

All of these are top defensive prospects at their respective positions who potentially be available at pick 8.  Where as most "experts" or analyst have only 1-2 true offensive players going in top 10.  Other than the QB needy teams that will reach on quarterbacks this year in what one expert calls "the worst quarterback class since 2006" most only value Fournette, Dalvin Cook, Mike Williams, and maybe 1 of the left tackles going in the top 10 offensively.

I personally am on the Dalvin cook train at the moment after watching him in Florida State's bowl game.  But now that Jamal Adams (waiting decision)  and Malik Hooker should be available around 8 or even the monster DE Derek Barnett from UT could potentially be there.  I just see us taking more Defensive approach to this draft like the previous.

my just 2 cents.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnett will be there when we pick. Absolutely nothing makes sense for him to go ahead of us. Thanks to a Bengals win, looks like we get our chance to look at him.

Jamal Adams either goes to the Jets or us. If Jets opt for Fournette, or if Allen falls to them, then we're most likely getting Adams.

Malik Hooker - at this point - is a safe bet to go to San Diego, and possibly the Jets. San Diego needs a FS to replace Weddle, and Malik fits that role more than Adams ever would.

Allen won't be available for us. 

Everyone else is bottom 10 talent imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will prolly draft a DE.  Big men allow you to compete.  You have to get pressure on the qb.  Those are his philosophies.  He has shown in the past that he is fine with bandaids in the safety position.  He needed a CB last year, drafted a DT in the first.  If hes not going after an LT in the first than expect it to be a DE.  Hell he may even trade up out the 2nd to get a 2nd DE.  Bookends both with a 5th year option.  Now that sounds more gettlemen to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Then next season will be an episode of "Why Our Offense Sucks: A Story of a Franchise QB Looking For Help"

That doesn't mean we're not going offense the rest of the draft.

I expect a heavy dose of offense through rounds 2-5, maybe even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Catufb85 said:

Although tons of mock drafts have us selecting Fournette or even Dalvin Cook at pick number 8 in next years draft.  With Gettleman's BPA and defensive philosophy I would almost bet we don't go offense in the draft.  Now this is all speculation because we haven't had even the last college game, combine, pro days, etc.  But just thinking of the resumes at hand and with more and more players declaring for the NFL draft with the college season coming to an end, even though I think Fournette or my pick Dalvin Cook at number 8, just doesn't seem like a reality at least to me. Heres why: TOO MUCH defensive talent in a very deep draft.  Top Defensive prospect that will most likely be available at 8

SS Jamal Adams

DE Derek Barnett

SS Malik Hooker (recently declared)

DE Jonathan Allen

S Jabrill Peppers

DE Carl Lawson.

All of these are top defensive prospects at their respective positions who potentially be available at pick 8.  Where as most "experts" or analyst have only 1-2 true offensive players going in top 10.  Other than the QB needy teams that will reach on quarterbacks this year in what one expert calls "the worst quarterback class since 2006" most only value Fournette, Dalvin Cook, Mike Williams, and maybe 1 of the left tackles going in the top 10 offensively.

I personally am on the Dalvin cook train at the moment after watching him in Florida State's bowl game.  But now that Jamal Adams (waiting decision)  and Malik Hooker should be available around 8 or even the monster DE Derek Barnett from UT could potentially be there.  I just see us taking more Defensive approach to this draft like the previous.

my just 2 cents.

 

 

 

 

Fournette is better than all those defense players you named, the only better prospect is Garrett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're right, but with regards to Jonathan Allen unless a character or medical issue comes up(i.e. Tunsil) there is zero chance he is there at 8. Also he would be a DT in 4-3, playing the same position as Short and Butler. He's only a DE in a 3-4. If he's there you trade down and get a bunch of picks from someone who really wants and needs him.

I know the "he won't be there thing" is played out, but there are just 2 players won't be there at 8 and they are Jonathan Allen and Myles Garrett. Everyone else has a decent chance as of right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

That doesn't mean we're not going offense the rest of the draft.

I expect a heavy dose of offense through rounds 2-5, maybe even more.

that guy has hitched his wagon to complaining about the offense this offseason... it is insanity to reach at pick #8. If Adams or Barnette is there, Gettleman needs to grab one. Plenty of other picks to address the offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

That doesn't mean we're not going offense the rest of the draft.

I expect a heavy dose of offense through rounds 2-5, maybe even more.

The issue is we've only spent 1 first round pick on offense since drafting Cam and 2 second round picks, one of which is no longer on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

Barnett will be there when we pick. Absolutely nothing makes sense for him to go ahead of us. Thanks to a Bengals win, looks like we get our chance to look at him.

Jamal Adams either goes to the Jets or us. If Jets opt for Fournette, or if Allen falls to them, then we're most likely getting Adams.

Malik Hooker - at this point - is a safe bet to go to San Diego, and possibly the Jets. San Diego needs a FS to replace Weddle, and Malik fits that role more than Adams ever would.

Allen won't be available for us. 

Everyone else is bottom 10 talent imho.

Sign JPP and draft Barnett. I'd be pretty happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

that guy has hitched his wagon to complaining about the offense this offseason... it is insanity to reach at pick #8. If Adams or Barnette is there, Gettleman needs to grab one. Plenty of other picks to address the offense

Story of Cam's career

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Vikings bring back WR Thielen from Panthers Vikings get: WR Adam Thielen, conditional 2026 seventh-round pick, 2027 fifth-round pick Panthers get: 2026 fifth-round pick, 2027 fourth-round pick Vikings grade: A- Panthers grade: C+ The Vikings have re-united with their longtime receiver Adam Thielen. Assuming the conditions of the 2026 pick headed to Minnesota are met, the Vikings will have moved back two rounds in next year's draft and one round in 2027's draft to acquire the single year remaining on the 35-year-old receiver's contract. This is fine business. The Vikings' receiver depth will be tested early this season, as WR3 speedster Jalen Nailor recovers from a hand injury and WR2 Jordan Addison serves a three-game suspension. Depth receiver Rondale Moore had a season-ending knee injury early this offseason, leaving rookie Tai Felton and veteran Tim Jones as the depth behind Justin Jefferson to start the season. Thielen should slot right into a familiar offense and provide a good safety blanket for young quarterback J.J. McCarthy, who needs strong early performances in September to boost his confidence and generate some positive momentum. I like the deal a lot for that reason: McCarthy won't spend the first three starts of his NFL career endeavoring to make up for bad receiver play. This is actually a bigger risk for the Panthers than it appears. From Week 8 on last season -- the stretch in which quarterback Bryce Young came back and looked solid -- Thielen was the Panthers' best receiver. Sure, guys like Jalen Coker and Ja'Tavion Sanders were having breakout games, and the backs were getting involved as pass catchers, but it was Thielen who drove the ship. Thielen averaged 2.47 yards per route run in that stretch, which was the 14th best number in the NFL. He also caught 80% of his targets when Coker and Xavier Legette caught 63.2% and 56.4%, respectively. Thielen was so valuable that the Panthers gave him a raise in March worth $1.5 million to encourage him to stave off retirement. The drafting of first-round receiver Tetairoa McMillan always foretold a decrease in target share for Thielen. But keeping Thielen around for another year would have helped smooth the transition. Now the Panthers enter the season with a starting receiver trio (McMillan, Coker and Legette) full of big-play potential but no proven chemistry with Young over the middle of the field. That's an important cornerstone of the Panthers' offensive system that needs replacing. -- Solak
    • You guys are such chicken littles. Its a relatively minor procedure. He will miss week one and that's it.
×
×
  • Create New...