Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers interviewing asst GM Beane


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

I can't wait. Just imagine us having to turn over almost our entire defensive coaching staff, yet the offense isn't touched. Yet they want to change on offense and Im sure they want continuity on defense. 

None of this is leaving me terribly optimistic I have to admit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all those who have been screeching about how bad our management and coaching is, please understand that roughly half the teams in the league would give anything to have what we're working with. Another fourth of the league would at least consider seriously trading for our staff as a group.

And all but say the top five teams would probably like to come through and pick up a piece or two from our staff here.

This is a quality organization, hands down. If we're lucky, we won't be raided to heavily, but there are some good folks who have the ability and deserve to move up if the offer comes their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Legit possibility.

If anyone leaves it would be MCD imo. Wilks will stay and take our D.C. Job, plus he's assistant HC why would he leave that. Beane probably won't leave because he will replace Getty when he retires or leaves. We may be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 15 said:

what are you talking about lol?

I should say "successor". Gettleman is going to be 66 next month and eats like crap. Beane is 40 and has been with the Panthers since '98, assistant GM as of now learning under Gettleman the past few years. It would be a coup to lose him now since he's clearly the man being groomed for the GM job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...