Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oui. Someone's Confident.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, TheRed said:

Offensively they are damn good.

Defensively... This is the same team that lost to the Chargers at home. The same Chargers team that surrendered a victory to the at the time historically winless Cleveland Browns.

If the Falcons aren't careful, the Seahawks will flat out take their lunch money, and another run at the Super Bowl.

They're not terrible on D. They can get pressure on the QB and we all know Seattle's Oline isn't very good. Not to mention they already won in Seattle and now Thomas is out. I think ATL wins this one. (Just puked typing that). 

But you're right they're not a perfect team - no one outside of NE is complete IMO (maybe KC). The Chargers loss was a bad one, but the Chargers can score and the ATL coach made some questionable calls at the end there. The Chargers lost to the Browns in week 16 when everyone had packed it up - not sure I would "count" that too much.

Edit: yes I fuged up - ATL lost in Seattle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoaringRiot said:

They're not terrible on D. They can get pressure on the QB and we all know Seattle's Oline isn't very good. Not to mention they already won in Seattle and now Thomas is out. I think ATL wins this one. (Just puked typing that). 

But you're right they're not a perfect team - no one outside of NE is complete IMO (maybe KC). The Chargers loss was a bad one, but the Chargers can score and the ATL coach made some questionable calls at the end there. The Chargers lost to the Browns in week 16 when everyone had packed it up - not sure I would "count" that too much.

They lost in Seattle this year. Although Richard Sherman blatantly holding Julio down by the arm at the end of the game probably prevented them from being able to kick a fg to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cj72 said:

They lost in Seattle this year. Although Richard Sherman blatantly holding Julio down by the arm at the end of the game probably prevented them from being able to kick a fg to win.

Sorry, you're right. I was thinking they "should have" won. That was a 5a mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'm cheering for green bay because I really really don't want Dallas to win. Dallas and 49er fans are already obnoxious with their "we have so many rings from years ago" talk. Nevermind the fact that since the Panthers have existed they have the same number of rings. 

 

Oh and his fug the falcons and seahawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

They're not terrible on D. They can get pressure on the QB and we all know Seattle's Oline isn't very good. Not to mention they already won in Seattle and now Thomas is out. I think ATL wins this one. (Just puked typing that). 

But you're right they're not a perfect team - no one outside of NE is complete IMO (maybe KC). The Chargers loss was a bad one, but the Chargers can score and the ATL coach made some questionable calls at the end there. The Chargers lost to the Browns in week 16 when everyone had packed it up - not sure I would "count" that too much.

It's certainly possible they could beat Seattle. They are a good team, no doubt.

Realistically, Atlanta is going to have to not only beat the Seahawks, but the referees, and that plain old fashioned absurd luck that seems to follow the Seahawks with those flukey plays that seem to happen at the right moment. It will be interesting.

Also, bruh, how you gonna lie to my face, and say they beat Seattle already?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's your right to refer to it as vague, but it still flouts the theory of "zero evidence" that Tepper is changing. Here's another: "Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales and general manager Dan Morgan are reportedly being given a larger leadership role within the organization. Panthers owner David Tepper 'has taken a more hands-off approach of late,' according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. 'He's trying to trust Canales and GM Dan Morgan to get it right, knowing that the roster requires patience in its current state,' Fowler wrote. 'We shall see if he holds to that.'" https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10146782-report-panthers-david-tepper-has-taken-a-more-hands-off-approach-to-team   ""David Tepper just wants to win and he's gonna supply everything that we need to win.. Things are changing around here and things are looking really positive" ~ Dan Morgan  https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/1917639137550627107?t=6vgo8yXTO6eD0Gb55hyzNg&s=19   From about 2:15-6:35, Julian Council, Locked on Panthers, gives his take on whether Tepper seems to be changing (and specifically referenced the war room in his analysis):    Dean Jones of Cat Crave on David Tepper in the war room. "He was an innocent bystander throughout a hugely important decision, placing full trust in Morgan and Tilis to make the right call." Jones also quoted Pat McAfee: "What I noticed though, at one point, they looked at (David) Tepper to get an answer, Tepper didn’t say sh*t. All anybody has said about Tepper is that he’s hands-on, hands-on, hands-on. Too handsy, too involved. He’s not letting the football people do their thing. We just watched in the biggest moment for their franchise, a top ten pick, he just sat there and let everybody do their jobs. I think if you’re a Panthers fan, you love everything you saw there." https://catcrave.com/silence-from-david-tepper-becomes-panthers-loudest-victory Granted, you're not getting a major headline here, but that's not going to happen anyway. Fowler isn't exactly a nobody, everybody knows McAfee, and you also have some locals that follow the team (including Dean Jones). Of course you have a right to believe that Tepper hasn't really changed, but to say there is no evidence that he just may be changing is not really true. It's just not. Hate the guy, but the way that he has handled this current regime is different than he handled previous teams, and his silence in the war room and publicly in general is different than years back.
    • Ehhh im not mad either way I don't think hes garbage but he was and is overpaid.... but he was a skating turnover machine.
    • My interpretation of his comments was somewhat different. And I took issue with his contract the day he signed. But it's all history now and doesn't matter in the big picture.
×
×
  • Create New...