Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Line 17th per PFF


top dawg

Recommended Posts

17. Carolina Panthers (6)

Top overall grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 85.7 (No. 11)

Top pass-blocking grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 85.2 (No. 14)

Top run-blocking grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 84.8 (No. 4)

The loss of Michael Oher doesn’t seem like a huge deal until you consider that it puts Mike Remmers at left tackle, where he was simply out of his depth. Remmers gave up nine sacks and 49 total QB pressures this season, and was also flagged 15 times. Remmers’ move also opened up another problem position at right tackle. Daryl Williams wasn’t able to make that spot his own, and RG Trai Turner struggled badly when he was moved out there for three games late in the season. Turner’s season was a huge drop in quality from 2015; he was flagged four times more than last year, surrendering twice the number of sacks and 19 additional QB pressures, while not having nearly the same impact as a run blocker. This is a team that needs an injection of talent at the tackle position, but just getting everybody back in their regular positions likely will help significantly.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-this-season/

 

Coming from the 6th spot is quite a tumble indeed, but you'd think that we were bottom feeders of the league this past season the way that some fans talk. I think that it's fair to ask if the downturn of the O-line is commensurate with the fall of the offense in general (down to 15th, I believe) and individual players whose stats also were negatively impacted to varying degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Injuries were the killer for us over the long haul. Kalil and Oher going out were major blows and Remmers can be a very serviceable right tackle but he struggled on the left side. Of course, it's never just a simple flip from one side of the line to the other... you've got a different job on each play from before and you are generally facing a completely different style of edge rusher.  Combine that with the loss of Kalil's protection calls at the line and he struggled, but with good reason. It shows that Oher really was a find for us. Neither of those two are bound for Canton, but they are better in their regular position than average.

The sad part of it was we had a lot of hope that Williams would come in and just wow us. He... just didn't. And Turner is really a great find at guard, but tackle is too much.

I'd say we need help at the tackle position, but the truth is, every team needs tackles. They aren't skilling up the ones at the college level to meet the needs of NFL teams and the position is really hard to play well AND stay uninjured in. Big guys who are light on their feet, but can maul opponents and play every down and learn an entire playbook just don't grow on trees.

I still think, even without major changes, that we'll be better next year if everyone can come back healthy. There's a lot more experience along the line than there was before and we got to see a couple of good back ups get some time on the field. We may have also found our eventual replacement for Kalil (and let's hope Ryan can stick with us for 5 or 6 more years.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

 

The sad part of it was we had a lot of hope that Williams would come in and just wow us. He... just didn't. And Turner is really a great find at guard, but tackle is too much.

 

 

Williams barely played much at all. He did real well from the games I saw. 

At the very least, he's an upgrade over Remmers. He shut out Beasley 2 games in a row, unlike Remmers.

Once the o-line got some stability with Larsen at center, Daryl Williams and Trai Turner showed up as of late. Even PFF agreed with that part. 

But really just got to wait it out. I think Daryl Williams is still the future until he proves otherwise. He's shown great flashes these past few games, and he's better than Remmers at everything.

Just need a healthy line period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

Coming from the 6th spot is quite a tumble indeed, but you'd think that we were bottom feeders of the league this past season the way that some fans talk. I think that it's fair to ask if the downtown of the O-line is commensurate with the fall of the offense in general (down to 15th, I believe) and individual players whose stats also were negatively impacted to varying degrees.

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Lol. If Cam had the Broncos O-line...

We'd be contemplating whether Cam retires immediately. Believe it or not we just have mediocre tackles, not bad.

This offense requires good tackles though, which is why the situation seems worse than it really is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Nothing is perfect, and probably can't be considering all of the dynamics that go into judging a player and a football team, but for all the flack PFF gets, it is arguably the best grading system out there. Mind you, I didn't say perfect or all-inclusive, but a pretty good reference.

As for our line, I've seen worse this year. Some of the teams we played had worse, and PFF's rankings reflect that. There are probably multiple posters on multiple football message boards across the Internet who are saying something similar to you about their team's O-line. The notion that "Our team has the worst O-line in the league," is not unique to the Panthers, or even a rare occurrence in general.

The fact is, we had a middle-of-the-pack O-line, and should have had at least a middle-of-the-pack type of result. Injuries, play calling, lack of imagination, lack of execution, inexperience, and a generally uninspired effort caused us to fall even further than we should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Williams barely played much at all. He did real well from the games I saw. 

At the very least, he's an upgrade over Remmers. He shut out Beasley 2 games in a row, unlike Remmers.

Once the o-line got some stability with Larsen at center, Daryl Williams and Trai Turner showed up as of late. Even PFF agreed with that part. 

But really just got to wait it out. I think Daryl Williams is still the future until he proves otherwise. He's shown great flashes these past few games, and he's better than Remmers at everything.

Just need a healthy line period.

Your last sentence is probably the biggest truth when it comes to a successful offensive line. If they stay healthy, they can be good. Almost every o-line starts to crumble at the first injury, by the second it becomes a disaster. Even Dallas' much-vaunted O-line would be hard pressed to lose two members and still be able to protect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious that the top priority needs to be the o-line. Either bring in top o-line free agents, or take the best the draft has to offer. Enough with wasted defensive picks that have minimal impact on the game. This is a passing league and the rules favor the receivers. Cam wants to go over the top of the defense with his throws, so the o-line needs to be premium. We need to be scoring in the 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact we were that high is a bit impressive.  People seem to devalue the effect of injuries.  I know every team deals with some injuries but ours were abnormally high.

At certain points this year we had a 2nd or 3rd string LT, 2nd or 3rd string center, 2nd string RG,  and 2nd or 3rd string RT.  Often times we had those backups playing at the same time.  There aren't many teams in the league who survive that.

By no means am I saying we shouldn't look for upgrades but if the line gets healthy we aren't near as bad as some on here think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused how us not protecting Cam Newton is the 'problem' meanwhile literally the worst offensive line in the league (Seattle) according to PFF won 10 games and received a 1st round bye this year. It's almost like they know how to disguise their weaknesses and win despite of them while we are using our weaknesses as an excuse to be bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...