Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Julius Thomas expected to be released from the Jaguars.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Julius Thomas can't block for poo. Why would we want an over glorified WR in a TE position? Olsen is still here and getting a TE isn't as urgent as other positions. 

We haven't had a good blocking, dedicated TE in years (and, no, blocking isn't Olsen's forte), so what's the difference? 

The fact is, we can't run legit two TE sets because we haven't had a legit threat since Shockey. Moreover, in my opinion the most important reason that we do need another pass-catching threat at TE is because we don't have a legitimate threat other than Olsen. If he is ever out for any appreciable amount of time, then our season becomes an instant question mark. I don't think that this should be so for any position other than QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight.  You have a TE that's getting cut from the JAGUARS after showing up out of shape and leveraging a Peyton Manning offense to get paid, and you want to sign him?  First question is, can I have some of what you're drinking?  Second is, just how much do you want to pay for this guy?  As much as some of the idiot Front Offices out there who are more focused on Fantasy Football results from three years ago than what he's done in the past two?

I would rather have Ed Dickson any day--he shows up and he can block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

 

 

Well for starters, Olsen is a great blocking TE. He's worked on his craft. He does it all. 

Olsen has worked himself into being a decent blocker, but "great?"

Anyway, I tried in vein to find Julius Thomas numbers regarding blocking, but I did find this, a little dated, but not that old.

http://www.itsalloverfatman.com/broncos/entry/just-how-bad-of-a-blocker-is-julius-thomas

If Olsen can work it out, Thomas can too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cyberjag said:

So let me get this straight.  You have a TE that's getting cut from the JAGUARS after showing up out of shape and leveraging a Peyton Manning offense to get paid, and you want to sign him?  First question is, can I have some of what you're drinking?  Second is, just how much do you want to pay for this guy?  As much as some of the idiot Front Offices out there who are more focused on Fantasy Football results from three years ago than what he's done in the past two?

I would rather have Ed Dickson any day--he shows up and he can block.

Nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

And don't get me wrong @Ivan The Awesome, I can take him or leave him per Gettleman's desires, but it's not because of blocking, but injuries. 

I don't see a problem with a low risk contract and kicking the tires though.

Low risk, high reward is in Gettleman's toolbox. I can see that happening. I just don't see him getting a huge contract from us. Not after the man got paid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...