Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you rather (Ginn/DJax edition)

@bobbyagnese

By @bobbyagnese,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted

With Ginn you get durability, with Jax you get reliability.

Ginn might drop things but he'll show up every game day

Jax will catch most things but he might miss a few games here an there due to injury.

Ginn to me is a discount Jackson and I like Ginn, but I won't be heartbroken if we get Jackson even though I doubt it and think he goes back to Philly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted

I like DJax but I don't want to overpay for that dude. He's no spring chicken either. In two years we'd probably be cutting him.

An aging Ted Ginn is still faster than everyone else. 

Would like us to draft a slot WR and fix the o line so the WR we currently have can do work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

lol at either at that number.

Ginn better stay for around 2.5-3.5 Mil a year for 3 years. He's 31, and not worth more than that much money as a WR. His Special Teams game has been sub-par as of late, and his drops seem to come at bad times.

Anybody paying DJax 9 Mil a year deserves the cap hell they'll probably be in. That's more than Antonio Brown currently makes. DJax is 30, and only worth possibly 7.5 mil a year, probably less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Newbie

Mojo

Posted
Posted

Byrd can be groomed to be our next Ginn, and imo his ceiling is higher than Ginn because Ginn is so scared of contact.  From what small sample size I've seen, no pun intended, Byrd is willing to go up and get it.  My answer is Djax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
@bobbyagnese Newbie

@bobbyagnese

Posted
  • Author
Posted
27 minutes ago, Bronn said:

lol at either at that number.

Ginn better stay for around 2.5-3.5 Mil a year for 3 years. He's 31, and not worth more than that much money as a WR. His Special Teams game has been sub-par as of late, and his drops seem to come at bad times.

Anybody paying DJax 9 Mil a year deserves the cap hell they'll probably be in. That's more than Antonio Brown currently makes. DJax is 30, and only worth possibly 7.5 mil a year, probably less.

Making 9 mil now, but okay 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...