Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you take Steve Young seriously as an analyst...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

... this makes it sound like you probably shouldn't.

Steve Young does damage control

Quote

 

“My wife hates football, and my kids don’t really care,” Young told Alex Sherman of Bloomberg Businessweek. “I see myself as a deal guy first. I’ve put football behind me. Roger Staubach once told me  — and I’ll never forget it: ‘When you retire, run. Never look back.'”

Sherman explains that Young “may have quit ESPN years ago if not for his private equity partners, who like him to keep a high profile,” and that Young “spends no more than an hour or two at the stadium” preparing for what he’ll say on the air.

“Once the game starts, he barely watches the action,” Sherman writes.

Ouch!

If you want to see the article where he originally made the now disputed comments in context, click here: Bloomberg.com

A source at ESPN defended Young's work ethic, but it'd be valid to ask "What else would they do?". Young has also stated since that he is fully committed to excellence in his broadcasting career.

So do you believe him?

If you were ESPN, would you keep him or dump him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, countryboi said:

if he is not watching the game and only spending an 1 getting ready...how does he not fall on his face? it would seem to me that he should way out his depth next to someone that spends more time getting ready?

It aint hard to fake it. Broadcasters say wrong "facts" all the time with nobody there to correct them. They get so much information fed to them that all he has to do is get there, look at the roster, and google a few key players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

It aint hard to fake it. Broadcasters say wrong "facts" all the time with nobody there to correct them. They get so much information fed to them that all he has to do is get there, look at the roster, and google a few key players. 

Especially when you're as intelligent and understand football as intimately as Steve Young does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN as a whole is hard to watch. They are doing what all cable channels do and that's get away from their core.

How many talk shows do i need to distinguish yourself from the previous talk show?

First take and the one on FS1A with Skip makes my eyes bleed.

But talk shows are super cheap and they promote the hell out of them on ESPN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young is a HOF QB. I'm sure he doesn't have to watch everything to explain a concept or make a comment.

And it's not like sports broadcasting is a rocket science. Formers players at least fug up all the time and don't actually offer that much more insight then a regular broadcaster most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Young is a HOF QB. I'm sure he doesn't have to watch everything to explain a concept or make a comment.

And it's not like sports broadcasting is a rocket science. Formers players at least fug up all the time and don't actually offer that much more insight then a regular broadcaster most of the time.

See, my thing on that front: Like with The Terminator, it's what he does. It's all he does (or at least all he's supposed to be doing).

Pretty sure that for the vast majority of people here, were they found by their employer to be on their job but actually doing something other than their job, said employer would disapprove.

Plus, let's be real. We're not exactly talking about a kid working in a sweatshop for pennies here.

If you're being paid (handsomely) to simply talk about a football game, I don't really think it's out of line to ask that you actually watch the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In all honesty, he should probably get that checked out. It might be (Arnold Schwarzenegger voice) "a tuuumaaa" 
    • Ah yes, my bad. It's easy to forget those handful of games Frank coached. LOL 
    • I've seen the comp a few times, and I feel there is a lot to it. Our situation is a lot like Kansas City was pre-Mahomes (without the HOF HC) Whether you like them or not, D&D are building something here.  They had a strong draft.  The team is slowly coming together, developing some identity, and has some decent blue chip parts.  Brown, Horn, McMillan, and a good OL situation that we should keep fortifying every year.  It's not much yet, but growing.    Bryce is in that Alex Smith spot.  A top draft pick, has never been overly impressive, but you can win games when he's safe with the ball.  You're not winning because of him - maybe once in a blue moon.  From time to time he's shown the ability to orchestrate some plays and lead drives.  I just don't see anything that is like - "oh snap, yeah don't let him go, he's ours".  He'll make a solid/good throw every now and again, but man, it is a struggle a lot of the time to watch.  Some terrible performances to speak of, heck he's already been benched once during year 2.      He should in no way preclude you from flirting with what else is out there.  This is not a marriage.  If you're in position (or trade range) for a guy you REALLY like come draft day, you shoot your shot. If we are in the draft process, and suddenly realize QB3-4 is a guy we really like, that's when you make a modest jump from like 16 to 11 or something like that.  Just like the Bills did for Allen, like the Chiefs did for Mahomes.  This is nothing magical that plants this franchise savior title on them, this is not some stupid trade-- it's an easy trade up to get a guy you like w/a big ceiling.  It's all player dependent and coaching/development driven.  If we don't like a QB, by all means fortify the front-7, get an awesome OLB or ILB prospect.   But we're on year 3, you kind of know what you're getting at this point.  Mostly sub-200 yard performances, low YPA, bad technique, poor mechanics, some decent stuff sprinkled in, but some bad turnover heavy ones that kill the team's momentum.  Again, run with him if there's no complete disaster that happens the remainder of the season, but don't close the door on something better just because of the investment or debatable performances.     
×
×
  • Create New...