Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ladies and gentlemen, the Cleveland Browns


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Browns considering Mitch Trubisky with #1 pick

Not to slam Trubisky, but is there really a good argument for him going #1 overall?

Watched him at UNC and thought he has the potential to be a franchise QB. Not saying he is a lock to be but I believe he will be in the right situation. Not sure the Browns are that situation lol. He is from around Cleveland as well. Would suck for Cleveland if he goes to another team and is very successful and they miss out on not only a franchise QB AGAIN but a guy from their area. The problem with UNC was not their offense it was their defense. Injuries did hurt the offense as well, however, like when Mack Hollins went down. Hollins was a legit deep threat and tall at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland had #1 and #12, in-between 3 QBs could get drafted. They should take the best player on their board, then have deals in place to move up form 12 to land their favorite QB. Panthers at #8, we've done business last year.....

 

Fyi panthers are going crazy about 4 out of 98, Cleveland has 4 out of 65 in this deep draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's a franchise QB, or even just a good QB, it's not a reach for a team desperate for someone decent under center like the Browns are. They've got to be praying they can pick a good one, then have a coach that can do something with him.

Even so, they are a couple of years away from relevance. But stars on offense win games, particularly QBs, and a passable defense can be put together on the fly and filled in later. Cam first, the next year Luke, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

If he's a franchise QB, or even just a good QB, it's not a reach for a team desperate for someone decent under center like the Browns are. They've got to be praying they can pick a good one, then have a coach that can do something with him.

Even so, they are a couple of years away from relevance. But stars on offense win games, particularly QBs, and a passable defense can be put together on the fly and filled in later. Cam first, the next year Luke, for example.

Trubisky over someone like Myles Garrett though?

You'd have to have a pretty impressive argument to talk me into that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

As a UNC alum, I honestly thought Trubisky was unimpressive.  He made a lot of boneheaded plays and to me, Williams had more command over the offense in his time as a starter than Trubisky did in his.

Shocking that a four year starter had more command over the offense than a first year starter, right?

Trubisky's accuracy is phenomenal.

I hope the Browns pass on him simply because I'm curious to see how he'll do in the NFL and Cleveland is an NFL graveyard and a dumpster fire of an organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The guy has not coach college in ten years and in that span its greatly changed. Still take him over Davis, I want to see the presser and if billy still has fire in his eyes for college non-sense.....plus you know billy will want a multi-million staff.  This is interesting, very....... glad the old guard FINALLY steps aside......
    • Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
×
×
  • Create New...