Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

POLL: Choices (3 Round Mocks)

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Carolina Panthers

Which Mock?  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. Choose:

    • A
      30
    • B
      7
    • C
      11
    • D
      24

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A for sure. Though I doubt Obi will be there at #40. Someone will likely take him in the latter part of round one.

I really want either Zay Jones or Chris Godwin in the 2nd. My preference is Jones, but I wouldn't be upset in the least about Godwin.

I was really on the fence until I became aware of their respective TD totals relative to their production. It could be a telltale sign. As such, It's Godwin all day for me, but I'd be happy with Zay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

I was really on the fence until I became aware of their respective TD totals relative to their production. It could be a telltale sign. As such, It's Godwin all day for me, but I'd be happy with Zay. 

Last year may have been a bit of an anomaly for Godwin with TDs though. He had 11 on 59 catches which is amazing, but he had 5 TDs on 69 catches the season before.

Plus, I'm not all that concerned about another redzone target. No matter who we draft at WR, KB and Olsen are still going to be our primary redzone targets. We need someone who can help us move the ball between the 20s and keep teams honest so that they can't key on KB and Olsen.

I just think Jones is probably the most polished WR in the draft and that's what we need. We need a technician. Enough with the projects and measurables guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Last year may have been a bit of an anomaly for Godwin with TDs though. He had 11 on 59 catches which is amazing, but he had 5 TDs on 69 catches the season before.

Plus, I'm not all that concerned about another redzone target. No matter who we draft at WR, KB and Olsen are still going to be our primary redzone targets. We need someone who can help us move the ball between the 20s and keep teams honest so that they can't key on KB and Olsen.

I just think Jones is probably the most polished WR in the draft and that's what we need. We need a technician. Enough with the projects and measurables guys.

I really don't believe Godwin can be considered a project per se. I've done a little research on both. Whereas Jones' coach purposely tried to make sure he was a complete receiver, Godwin was a victim of not only a run-first offense, but one in where the QB spread the ball around a lot. Although he was their best, they didn't force feed Godwin the ball. Godwin has shown all the traits of being a complete receiver, in between the twenties, and in the red zone. He's a chain mover, and can play on the outside. 

I admit that I could be wrong, but I believe that his upside is higher than Jones'.  But, at the end of the day, I think that Jones could do just as well given the right circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lasus83. Newbie

Lasus83.

Posted
Posted
whats it going to take for 'you people' to put an offensive tackle in the top four picks? its happening!!!! like im on a message board with 100 Dave Gettlemen!

Ok, pick a name from the list:


Offensive Tackle 
Taylor Moton, Western Michigan | SR, PRO | Projected: 2nd Rd. 
Sam Tevi, Utah | EW, WOR | Projected: 5th Rd. 
Zach Banner, USC | SR | Projected: 4th Rd. 
Julien Davenport, Bucknell | SR, WOR | Projected: 4th-5th Rd. 
Sean Harlow, Oregon State | WOR | Projected: 4th-5th Rd. 
Tyler Catalina, Georgia | PRO | Projected: UDFA 
Cam Robinson, Alabama | PRI, WOR | Projected: 1st-2nd Rd. 
Antonio Garcia, Troy | PRO | Projected: 3rd Rd. 
Garett Bolles, Utah | PRO, PRI | Projected: 1st-2nd Rd. 
Forrest Lamp, Western Kentucky | WOR | Projected: 1st-2nd Rd. 
Darrell Williams Jr, Western Kentucky | WOR | Projected: UDFA 
Dion Dawkins, Temple | PRO, PRI | Projected: 2nd Rd. 
Mason Zandi, South Carolina | LOC | Projected: UDFA 
Jamal Covington, Charlotte | LOC | Projected: UDFA 
David Sharpe, Florida | PRI | Projected: 3rd-4th Rd. 
Jordan Morgan, Kutztown | WOR | Projected: 4th Rd.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Quick FYI

      By csx · Posted

      Get well
    • PanthersGTI
      Kyle trask released by bucs

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • d-dave
      Experience with Electric Vehicles?

      By d-dave · Posted

      Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...