Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman thinks McCaffrey is a three down player, not a three down back


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

That is the impression I got from being at the press conference. When asked if McCaffrey is a three down back, he didn't say yes. He said, well, he can run and he can catch, I guess that is three downs. 

What I take from that is the Panthers see him as a 3rd down back and a slot player. Not someone they can rely on in 3rd and short situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

That is the impression I got from being at the press conference. When asked if McCaffrey is a three down back, he didn't say yes. He said, well, he can run and he can catch, I guess that is three downs. 

What I take from that is the Panthers see him as a 3rd down back and a slot player. Not someone they can rely on in 3rd and short situations. 

A pitch or screen to Mcaffery on 3rd and short could be a possibility; as long as someone explains that to Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

That is the impression I got from being at the press conference. When asked if McCaffrey is a three down back, he didn't say yes. He said, well, he can run and he can catch, I guess that is three downs. 

What I take from that is the Panthers see him as a 3rd down back and a slot player. Not someone they can rely on in 3rd and short situations. 

Yeah I caught that as well. I think we like him a lot but not at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

That is the impression I got from being at the press conference. When asked if McCaffrey is a three down back, he didn't say yes. He said, well, he can run and he can catch, I guess that is three downs. 

What I take from that is the Panthers see him as a 3rd down back and a slot player. Not someone they can rely on in 3rd and short situations. 

doesn't a 3 down back generally imply being able to play on 3rd and long not 3rd and short?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

doesn't a 3 down back generally imply being able to play on 3rd and long not 3rd and short?

A 3 down back generally implies that you can run between the tackles downs 1 and 2 and catch passes or pass protect out of the back field on third down.  Example, Adrian Peterson is not a 3 down back because his pass catching is sub par, which is why he subs out typically on passing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think McCaffrey could be the best RB by a fair margin in the draft IF he went to the right team.  Situation matters in terms of how successful players can be.

McCaffrey IMO would be a beast in NE's scheme or a team like that.  He seems like an odd fit here.  Not sure we are built to get the fullest out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...