Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Gettleman will not trade up from 8


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Bill Voth @PanthersBill 3h3 hours ago

Bill Voth Retweeted polite anarchist

no reason to be all that worried about it, IMO. felt like DG only left open possibility on Fri. cause it was the right thing to say.https://twitter.com/jollroger1969/status/856244008460460037 

Bill Voth added,

polite anarchist @jollroger1969
@PanthersBill If we move up to 3 to take LF I will b very upset .4 a GM who preaches value & importance of pix we trade 2 many for 2 little
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, I believe Panther's will only pick at 8th, if one of following 3 guys will be there...

Saloman Thomas, Jamal Adams and Fournette, but I am even not sure about Fournette, DG is so fond about that 5th year option on first rounder, what will be reason to use a 1st on a guy, who could be injured and out of the league in 5 years (RB carry that risk more then any other position in NFL)....

All the other potential guys Panthers are interested, can be found in the bracket of 12-16, which I guess, we will do such a trade with QB needy team...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, top dawg said:

Gettleman basically suggested that he'd only give up a two or three anyway, if that. He's not giving away the house, people, even if he would do it.

In this draft the talent level is too deep, especially at TE, S, RB, three key areas for us.   There are probably 40 players or more with first round grades (depending on who is doing the grading).  If we select properly we could end up with two players graded out as a first roundesr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Verge said:

If it only takes a second maybe a third round pick to go from 8 to 6, why wouldn't you do it to guarantee your guy?

Because they are Madden GMs and know what they are doing. They clearly know the value of the picks and players of this draft because of YouTube. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...