Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gareon Conley - Sexual assualt in Cleveland


bababoey

Recommended Posts

Well, based on this link: http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2017/4/24/15412402/tracking-the-cleveland-browns-2017-nfl-draft-interests-final-edition

It is one of these prospects slated to go 1 or 1/2:

Pos Player School
QB Mitchell Trubisky North Carolina
RB Dalvin Cook Florida State
WR Mike Williams Clemson
WR Corey Davis Western Michigan
WR John Ross Washington
TE O.J. Howard Alabama
TE David Njoku Miami
DE Myles Garrett Texas A&M
DE Solomon Thomas Stanford
OLB Takkarist McKinley UCLA
CB Marshon Lattimore Ohio State
S Malik Hooker Ohio State
QB DeShone Kizer Notre Dame
QB Deshaun Watson Clemson
CB Gareon Conley Ohio State
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job by his lawyer scheduling the interview AFTER the draft. I would hope that any perspective teams thinking of drafting this guy will know beforehand... Because I could see that causing some serious buyers remorse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GolfRasta said:

Cleveland Board seems to think it could be Njoku...He had a visit on the 10th.

Nevermind...Njoku was with the Dolphins that weekend.  Good thing because I have a feeling that's who we may trade back up in 1st to get if he slipps into the mid-20s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I hope it was Conley, do not want


Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Jesus man how out of touch are you? I hope it was no one because 1 sexual assault is beyond horrible for any one to have happen to them and 2 because I don't want to see any ones life ruined over something that may or may not be true. If player x did the crime he should be punished. If he didn't I hope the woman filing a false claim is instead

Shame on you for "hoping" it's any one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...