Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade KB for a first next year?


t96

Recommended Posts

Just a thought that popped into my head in response to Jeremy's article about KB being done here. If he truly may be done here past next year then why not try to trade him now? Let the offense get a jumpstart without him and have continuity for going forward. Don't know if we could get a first, but if we could would you trade him for one? What about a 2nd from a rebuilding team who'll likely be picking early? 

 

Personally, I'm not ready to give up on him at all and hope we pick up his 5th year option and keep him, but it does seem like a possibility the team is getting tired of some of his sh*t going on. I mean, the TC before he got hurt he was looking like a Dez Bryant or AJ Green type of dominating player, and that was going up against Norman. I still feel he can get to that level here and while yes the offense seemed better without him, I don't think that means we can't make the offense work even better with him as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a first is that outrageous. KB wasn't any worse than Cooks who yielded the Aints a first. KB in NO with Brees throwing the ball 50 times a game would've had a bigger impact than Cooks there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

I don't think a first is that outrageous. KB wasn't any worse than Cooks who yielded the Aints a first. KB in NO with Brees throwing the ball 50 times a game would've had a bigger impact than Cooks there.

I would happily trade him for cooks.. So that should tell you who is more valuable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I don't think a first is that outrageous. KB wasn't any worse than Cooks who yielded the Aints a first. KB in NO with Brees throwing the ball 50 times a game would've had a bigger impact than Cooks there.

I'm not sure we were watching the same two players. Brandin Cooks was a much better player than KB last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people drastically underestimate he value and talent of KB. Even captain said he was the only WR they were concerned with. He's a matchup nightmare and he's not the first talented young player to struggle with weight discipline. Trading him would be stupid. You guys act like he hasn't been productive he's been putting up numbers even the so called down year of last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

You people drastically underestimate he value and talent of KB. Even captain said he was the only WR they were concerned with. He's a matchup nightmare and he's not the first talented young player to struggle with weight discipline. Trading him would be stupid. You guys act like he hasn't been productive he's been putting up numbers even the so called down year of last season. 

Obviously they don't understand about complimentary pieces.

 

Just ask Green Bay when Nelson went out and Cobb tried to play outside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...