Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best Case/Worst Case


jfra78

Recommended Posts

Article from NFL.com on best/worst case scenarios for several offensive rookies

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000813690/article/nfl-rookie-forecast-bestcaseworstcase-for-offensive-notables

 

Part on CMC

 

Christian McCaffrey, RB, Carolina Panthers

No. 8 overall pick, Round 1, Stanford

 

Best-case scenario: McCaffrey is a matchup nightmare who gives defensive coordinators sleepless nights. The Panthers could fully take advantage of his skills as a triple-threat playmaker (runner/receiver/returner) to create big plays on offense and in the kicking game. With McCaffrey and Curtis Samuel serving as interchangeable big-play threats, the Panthers' offense can evolve into one of the NFL's most explosive units.

 

 

Worst-case scenario: Carolina's desire to evolve into a more diverse and dynamic unit could be derailed by Mike Shula's lack of creativity. The Panthers' longtime offensive coordinator has never really featured running backs prominently in his passing game in the past, which raises major concerns about McCaffrey's potential impact as a rookie. In addition, Cam Newton has never shown an interest in throwing the ball underneath to his backs when defenses take away the deep ball. Considering the track record of the play caller and quarterback, it's possible McCaffrey fails to make any impact on the Panthers' offense due to poor planning and execution.

 

Projected stats: 600 rushing yards, 600 receiving yards, eight total touchdowns.

 

I would be happy with those stats

 

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those stats would be a more than solid rookie campaign for CMC....what I think people are failing to mention is the impact of just having additional threats that can score from anywhere, on defenses. CMC and samuel create opportunities for our other guys as well. Single coverage for Kelvin, Fun, Olsen and shepard in the slot. Teams have to respect and commit defenders. There's going to be a mismatch somewhere at all times. Thats not something we've had.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

that hurt about as much as having a steel beam driven through your chest.

Sheesh. You guys are bastards.

 

 

 

 

I'm guessing you already knew that.

(I seriously doubt it's the first time you've been told)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

Worst-case scenario: Carolina's desire to evolve into a more diverse and dynamic unit could be derailed by Mike Shula's lack of creativity. The Panthers' longtime offensive coordinator has never really featured running backs prominently in his passing game in the past, which raises major concerns about McCaffrey's potential impact as a rookie. In addition, Cam Newton has never shown an interest in throwing the ball underneath to his backs when defenses take away the deep ball. Considering the track record of the play caller and quarterback, it's possible McCaffrey fails to make any impact on the Panthers' offense due to poor planning and execution.

Don't think we see worst case. I think there's a concerted effort to add emphasis in this area. In the past it may have been a secondary option, like Cam's option to tuck and run. Times change. Offensive lines get banged up. You get tired of your QB getting whacked while waiting for a down field receiver to get free. You draft a guy like CMC, with super quick moves, and you take advantage of his talents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

Cam threw a lot underneath to Stewie for big plays before Shula, so this guy is kinda stupid.

Cam has never been without Shula who was his quarterback coach and would have advising him to work the whole field and dump it off. I wonder if calling more screens had to do with a better offensive line that could get out in space and had receivers like Steve Smith who were beasts as downfield blockers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, caatfan said:

You draft a guy like CMC, with super quick moves, and you take advantage of his talents. 

The best thing about our draft is that we took two guys that fill the same hybrid role for us. I actually anticipate Samuel getting the same looks as McCaffrey, though perhaps not at many. In essence, they are very similar players drafted to play different roles in our offense. At least that's the way it appears. If I'm wrong please feel free to correct me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...