Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouting the Panthers offense


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Interesting screen grab I saw on Twitter from the Amazon series about the LA Rams season. This is how the Rams viewed the Carolina Panthers offensive personnel last year 

I cleaned it up a bit to make it a little easier to read. 

ZEfhi9U.png

 

Looks like the color under each player mean something. 

 

Cam is the only one that is deep purple. Maybe elite player?

 

Red appears to be solid players. Olsen, Kalil, Turner, Benjamin, Stewart

 

Brown looks like average or role players - Norwell, Funchess, Tolbert

 

Purple looks like below average or backups to me. Remmers, Williams, Ginn, Dickson, Fozzy

 

Yellow looks like the bottom of the barrel or possibly the inactive players? Bersin, Artis-Payne, Hawkins, Simoson

 

 

Pretty interesting to see how other teams see the Panthers offense. If anyone can make out any of the text below the players chime in. Also chime in with your own thoughts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Icege said:

They've got Manhertz highlighted in black 

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

A player can outplay those three and still be terrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KSpan said:

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

No one in the NFL is game planning for Ted Ginn. They know he is fast and more than likely will drop one or 2 wide open tds before the games out. 

Very similar to what is thought of Shula around the league. He's a hack and everyone knows it. The exact reason no HC interviews for him. Everyone in the NFL knows he sucks except RR. On that note I Hope he proves me wrong this year  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Brown looks like average or role players - Norwell, Funchess, Tolbert

No way in frickin hell that's true. I know it's the Rams and their coaching staff, but even they can't feel that Norwell is anything but a beast. Can they?

 

Dumbasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...