Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predictions on Hurney trades?


t96

Recommended Posts

I'm fairly positive that after giving Greg and TD $100M deals each, his next order of business will be trading our next two first round picks for LeVeon Bell in a deal with the Steelers and then proceed to give him $20M/year as part of the deal to make him happy and sign his tag to be able to be traded. 

Hell, wouldn't be all that shocked if Josh Norman is a Panther again this season. What will it take to get him back though? Don't matter, no price is too high for Marty.

 

Seriously though, we should all be very very concerned with the possibility of him as interim GM making some flat out terrible trades with future picks. It's not just long term contracts that he can screw up for us even if he's just here a year. And don't bring up the Olsen trade. That was the extremely rare exception in Hurney's career. The rule is trades like Everette Brown, Otah, trying to trade Cam for Clausen, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's the GM for next year's draft, he's definitely trading the 2019 1st rounder.

Rivera looked very pleased during Hurney's presser. If we have a successful season, the Hurndog is back for good. 

I'm torn between hoping we do well (for obvious reasons) and hoping we tank for the well being of the future of the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If he's the GM for next year's draft, he's definitely trading the 2019 1st rounder.

Rivera looked very pleased during Hurney's presser. If we have a successful season, the Hurndog is back for good. 

I'm torn between hoping we do well (for obvious reasons) and hoping we tank for the well being of the future of the franchise.

We're in zero position to tank. Cam and Luke could both get hurt and we'd be a 7-9 team. DG set us up this year so damn well. I can see us winning it all this year (due to DG), Hurney getting the job full time and the roster turning to sh*t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

We're in zero position to tank. Cam and Luke could both get hurt and we'd be a 7-9 team. DG set us up this year so damn well. I can see us winning it all this year (due to DG), Hurney getting the job full time and the roster turning to sh*t.

If that's what it takes to win a ring... well then fug it, let's go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

That Greg Olsen trade sure sucked, now didn't it?

Of course it did because now the bastard wants more money. He's not a DT, how dare he ask for his market value. 

Yes this pure sarcasm/slash mimicking typical responses on here.

This whole Hurney vs Gettleman thing blows the doors off the Trump vs Clinton action in the tinderbox. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Zavala was really bad his first year but I think he can still flash that unfortunately. Coaching? IDK. Inconvenience seems to be common.  Moton should just have played the year out to see what's what or they should have replaced him, whixh is a tall order for a team with so much else needing done. I just thought the reworked deal was dumb. Get cap but create another issue later. Just eat it and move on. I do think they were trying to create space for someone else but that's also a huge negative for me because the 'one player away mentality' has always been a failure that I can remember. Corbett was a known health issue, a waste of roster space really. BC has had a fractured ankle and a torn bicep so he isn't a huge shocker either, unlucky or injury prone at this point? Add in Moton and that unit was always suspect. Having both high priced OGs dealing with injuries 1 year removed from their big deals just seems like the chefs kiss to that entire build. So 2 known injury issues with starters, a backup that's probably injury prone now, Mays and then nobodies. I don't think I can call that decent depth, especially considering the 2 known starter issues coming into the year.
    • Just imagine how great it will be when they eventually expand the playoff to 24 teams, or more. There will still only be 3 or 4 teams that have a real chance of winning the national championship, but the money-making opportunity will be too irresistible.
    • Trading Hubbard should be a decision made based on the "future" of the team. If they deem Rico a wiser investment, long term, Hubbard is expendable. If they deem Hubbard the wiser investment, long term, Rico is expendable. That doesn't mean they should have a price that is less than acceptable, however.
×
×
  • Create New...