Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam campaigned for McCaffrey over Fournette per team source relayed by Jonathan Jones


PantherWake

Recommended Posts

Quote

Newton campaigned pre-draft for McCaffrey over Leonard Fournette, according to a team source, because he believed Fournette was too similar to Stewart and that McCaffrey could offer something the Panthers have never had before. Newton does not have Kobe-like pull in this organization but clearly his input matters. Everyone there has hitched their wagon to him, from the owner who, 24 years ago, promised Charlotte a Super Bowl in the first 10 years of the franchise, to Rivera who, after a dozen or so job interviews, got his first head coaching job in 2011 and four months later joined Newton at the hip, to those in uniform who swear by him.

Many within the Panthers’ organization whispered that Newton had too much on his plate last off-season.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/07/26/nfl-cam-newton-carolina-panthers-offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn’t want to sit there and say, ‘I don’t like this play’ or ‘I don’t like that guy at that position.’ In his mind, he’s going to fix it and make it work.”

 

 

This says a lot about Cam's character. Cam could very easily trash half the guys at their positions yet he just takes upon himself to try and make things work. Lebron is running Kyrie out of town while Cam puts it on himself to earn a pay cheque for scrubs like Remmers and Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's obvious.. and understandable. Cam has had sub par receivers in most of his NFL career and has never played with RBs that were anywhere near as elusive as McCaffrey.  And maybe Cam was watching Super Bowl 51 just like the rest of us and proceeded to watch James White shred the living daylights out of the Falcons D through the air and on the ground.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“I’ve had to drag it out of him in terms of, ‘What do you see? What can we fix?,” Rivera says. “It always starts with him. He doesn’t want to sit there and say, ‘I don’t like this play’ or ‘I don’t like that guy at that position.’ In his mind, he’s going to fix it and make it work.”

 

 If this is true, then Cam is just as much at fault for bad play calls as Shula. This is his offense too and they need his input, regardless of whether it hurts anybody's feelings for not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

“I’ve had to drag it out of him in terms of, ‘What do you see? What can we fix?,” Rivera says. “It always starts with him. He doesn’t want to sit there and say, ‘I don’t like this play’ or ‘I don’t like that guy at that position.’ In his mind, he’s going to fix it and make it work.”

 

 If this is true, then Cam is just as much at fault for bad play calls as Shula. This is his offense too and they need his input, regardless of whether it hurts anybody's feelings for not.

Yeah he's going into year 7. He needs to be more vocal about what he sees and what works best for him even if it undermines someone. Just part of being the leader of the offense. He'll get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...