Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is SS Mike Adams a concern at this point?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Adams may have had the worst game overall on the starting defensive unity against the Titans. 

The touchdown in the corner of the end zone was on him. 

His tackling in run support was rather Tre Boston'esque. 

giphy.gif

 

So.... Are you concerned about the SS position, and if so, do you think the Panthers look to upgrade once cuts happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel like Gettleman originally wanted to finally shore the SS up for good when we first went for Barry Church. Seeing as we had no other option, he hoped Mike Adams would be a decent stop gap.

I thinks Adams is a slightly better version of 2015 Harper. He makes a lot of mistakes like this on film. But he also has a lot of good.

Nevertheless, yes, we'll need to be looking for a SS next year and soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He definitely didn't have a great game. But it could be a one off. He's looked good in practice and I think he will get interceptions. He's not the future but we're not gonna find another starting calibre safety at this point even if you don't like him. Because hes shown a lot of good i think I can forgive him one preseason game when lots of people didn't show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

The colts who need all the safety help they can muster let him walk for pennies, if that isn't a red flag IDK what is

Same could be said for Mike Mitchell when the Raiders let him walk, Roman Harper when the Saints let him walk.

Not sure why I'm arguing with you though it goes nowhere 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...