Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton is not healthy. Is it time to bench him for his own good?


Banjo

Cam Newton is not healthy. Is it time to bench him for his own good?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Bench Cam?

    • Yes, time to bench Cam.
    • No, keep him out there.


Recommended Posts

Igo mentioned the vicious cycle of his accuracy and soreness in another thread. This would be the way to fix it. Let him get right. I am angrier about him playing injured last year and not getting treatment when he needed it than I am about just about anything. That decision screwed us, and if he doesn't get well it could be disastrous for his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is the best he can be without being allowed to fully recover, then yeah. We need to sit him for his own good and ours as well.

Generally the policy is that if you can't practice, you can't play.

We're not doing him or the team any favors putting him out there if it's hampering his recovery. We need a fully healthy Cam if we're going to make any noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...