Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Worley Regressed?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I didn't see the game yesterday, but I downloaded it and was watching it last night before I fell asleep (long ass day)

Worley had not 1, but 2 pass interference calls in the 1st QUARTER. I fell asleep right after so I didn't finish, but did he play better? I'm going to guess no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be regression to me, I was asking for him to get benched seemed like he did briefly things went ok but he's a target to me. I've been saying if he played in NE we would have lost he would have been picked on consistently. Just how I see it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe my recollection is faulty about yesterday but, early in the game, when we weren't getting a lot of pass rush, Worley was awful and was being "picked on".

But later in the game, when the DL was getting consistent pressure, all of a sudden you no longer heard Worley's name that much.  Was that because he was out with injury (I do remember him picking up a knock... did he ever come back in afterward?)?  Or because the pass rush always improves the secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL.  That’s not his tree.  Not in Seattle, Tampa or here.  Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC.  That’s what Bryce needs to happen though  2 very different things 
    • Well, his job is to win and make Bryce better and other stuff too but he has to have a certain amount of buy in to make that work. If it is real or he has to talk himself into believing it, as coach and leader and in the context of the present time with the whole team needing to believe, who knows? You lie if you have to.  I think you have have to separate that Canales from the detached offseason evaluation Canales. It is possible that you are correct and he is sold on Bryce. It is also possible that he isn’t, but cannot confess.  
    • Ah yes, the old "accuse your opponent of what you're actually trying to do" tactic. Always amusing 😄 You wanna drop out? No problem, but you should probably do so by just admitting the conversation is over your head.  Though truth be told, even if you don't wanna admit it, I'm pretty sure anyone reading this, watching you dodge the questions and just cut and paste the same recycled answers over and over again can probably already see that 😆
×
×
  • Create New...