Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Reason Last Night's Loss Lingers More Than Usual


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

It's because, just like so many of our losses under this staff, it was winnable.  VERY winnable.  And it feels like we lost to a lesser team - because we did.  

The difference between our team and theirs is that we were outcoached, first and foremost.  I take nothing away from Philly.  They are a good, quality, most likely division-winning playoff team.  But, we are more talented where it matters...  difference is, we were outcoached, and thus outexecuted.  They put their players in positions to succeed, whereas our staff repeatedly put ours in positions to fail, and it is beyond frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

It's because, just like so many of our losses under this staff, it was winnable.  VERY winnable.  And it feels like we lost to a lesser team - because we did.  

The difference between our team and theirs is that we were outcoached, first and foremost.  I taking nothing away from Philly.  They are a good, quality, (most likely) division-winning playoff team.  But, we are more talented where it matters...  difference is, we were outcoached, and thus outexecuted.  Yhey puy their players in positions to succeed, whereas out staff repeatedly puy ours in positions to fail, and it is beyond frustrating.

Welcome to the dark side.  I've being saying this for a while now but get.. but but we won.   We win in spite of the coaching, not because of our coaching.  There's a yuge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It lingers because our best player's career is in jeopardy. I could care less about the loss at this point.

We got outplayed and got manhandled on the offensive line and still had multiple chances to win without our defensive quarterback for the 2nd half.

Coaching is partly to blame, but for the first time in a while I can see where the coaches are coming from when they preach execution. Some players ran some lazy routes, or didnt fight enough for yards when they caught the ball. Multiple drops. Some terrible safety and linebacker reads. On the Nelson Agholor TD, Byrd decided to triple cover someone instead of help Shaq. Trai Turner got destroyed by Cox most of the night. Cam played well most of the night but missed a few wide open players again.

Its crazy how much you see when you have seats a couple rows from the field. I wish I could go to every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

It lingers because our best player's career is in jeopardy. I could care less about the loss at this point.

We got outplayed and got manhandled on the offensive line and still had multiple chances to win without our defensive quarterback for the 2nd half.

Coaching is partly to blame, but for the first time in a while I can see where the coaches are coming from when they preach execution. Some players ran some lazy routes, or didnt fight enough for yards when they caught the ball. Multiple drops. Some terrible safety and linebacker reads. On the Nelson Agholor TD, Byrd decided to triple cover someone instead of help Shaq. Trai Turner got destroyed by Cox most of the night. Cam played well most of the night but missed a few wide open players again.

Its crazy how much you see when you have seats a couple rows from the field. I wish I could go to every game.

Yeah, but go down the list and tell me which of their units is better than ours.  DL is the only one I might give you.

Our players are misused.  They arent put in a position to execute and succeed.  And if execution is a problem, another thing that also needs to be looked at is the personnel being used, and the personnel available.  We're always late making adjustments when they're needed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sometimes bad execution happens in spite of good planning.

sometimes good execution happens in spite of bad planning.

sometimes bad execution is unavoidable in the wake of bad planning. that's where we are.

the players did the best they could with what they were directed to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We played like poo and still had a chance to win thanks to Cam Newton leaving it all out on the field. If the oline could block and Stewart could catch we would have won 24-14. If Shula had even half a brain we would have put up 40+.

This loss really showed just how bad our coaching is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, TheBiggerCat said:

I agree totally. The blame for this loss falls squarely on Rivera, Shula and Wilks shoulders. 

And if cam makes half his passes in the 4th Q that he missed on we win easily. 

There is plenty of blame to go around but there was nothing outside of Luke’s injury that couldn’t be fixed. I honestly chalk this one up more so to the short week then anything else.

everyone on here is super butt hurt after losses. But the huddle is gonna huddle, we have two very winnable games the next two weeks and a little bit of rest to go with it before we play our next tough opponent.

we just went 2-1 playing two games on the road against the reigning Super bowl champ, the team that was leading the NFCN at the time(and would still be and have been undefeated at the time we played them if not for a blown call by the refs in their game against Atlanta) and the best team from the NFCE on a short week. I honestly think we played great over the last 3 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been sticking up for the coaching staff for quite some time. And even I have to admit there was some timid play calling that cost us the game, but there were also turnovers, bad tackling and injuries that were not because of coaching.

Why we didn't go for the TD when we were inside their five-yard line and chose to go with a chip shot field goal instead, I have no idea. It might have mathematically been the right thing to do, but it was lousy football that just said they would let the Eagles dictate how the game would be played on Carolina's own field. Had the try failed, we would have still had them backed up against their own goal line. Secondly, what gives with not giving Gano a shot at the loooong field goal before the half? That made no sense. Let's not even get into the play calls on that last drive.

Now that that's out of the way... You aren't going to win many games giving up three interceptions. Period. That's mostly on Cam, partly on Stewart and partly on the offensive line. Before you start crying about the O-line pass blocking, Wentz had a much worse night behind his line and he managed to function.

But on the matter of the O-line... I have never seen one get so completely screwed up in run blocking. Fundamentals were completely abandoned by that unit -- both the individual players and Matsko should be refunding their game checks because they just didn't show up. Stewart might be an old warhorse, but he never got a chance to build up even the slightest head of steam. CMC didn't do much better, CAP was out there for some reason once -- maybe twice, and let's hope Fozzy gets better soon.

On defense, you can't blame the coaches for Luke's injury. We had some of the most successful blitzing we've seen in a long time and we've now seen where Thompson should be used on passing downs and it's not in coverage. Without Luke, though, it was a flailing monster without a head -- dangerous but undirected. And someone, please, step up for Colin Jones, he's just not cutting it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Now that that's out of the way... You aren't going to win many games giving up three interceptions. Period. That's mostly on Cam, partly on Stewart and partly on the offensive line

So getting hit while throwing the ball, tipping a ball into the air that's right in your hands, and a receiver running a route to the same area as another receiver instead of the middle of the field where he should have been... is mostly on Cam?

Jeebus, you people...

tumblr_maiw0rq56y1qatt68.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You want Josh McDaniels to be our Head Coach so all your narratives need to end 
    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...