Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"No one could run behind our line"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I feel like this isn't entirely accurate. 

 

The Panthers have three excellent run blockers in Norwell, Turner, and Williams. That is three more than many teams have. 

Tyler Larsen is an average run blocker. Not a plus, not a minus, typical NFL lineman. 

I'll give you Matt Kalil is awful, but most NFL teams have at least one bad offensive lineman. No excuse there. 

 

As such, instead of saying "No one could run behind our line" I propose we use the phrase "no one could run in our scheme" as at this point it is painfully obvious the woes in the running game come down to play design, coaching, and when they are called during the game. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's the line not Shula man . Shula ain't the one missing blocks Matt kalil and Williams are . Shula gets blamed for every little thing and still works hard each week and creates a good game plan for fans that don't care about him or the good job he is doing.

 

giphy (24).gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's the line not Shula man . Shula ain't the one missing blocks Matt kalil and Williams are . Shula gets blamed for every little thing and still works hard each week and creates a good game plan for fans that don't care about him or the good job he is doing.

Honest question : are u that guy on Twitter that hates me because he is Shulas cousin? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's certainly an element of play design in this, but I also have started to question the decision making on the field.  We know that Cam has options, and someone's calling out blocking assignments.  If this was all scheme even a pop warner coach would have adjusted by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's both...obviously.

You don't have a game where every RB posts a negative yards per rush avg. if either your scheme or your players have any quality at all.

Perfect confluence of suckitude.

My only hope is that Shula figures out how to be less predictable.  The scheme is overly complicated and the play selection is often questionable.

The real problem, though, is that the offense is out of sync.  When Shula calls a good series of plays (see the first drive in Chicago last week), the players don't execute (Samuel fumble).  We often end up in difficult down and distance, the pocket collapses (and Cam gets jittery), the ball is tipped, off target, or intercepted.

Then, Shula calls a real head scratcher.  Didn't we fail to score from like the 2 yard line vs the Eagles?  We suck in the red zone and that's mostly play calling.

Its a pattern of long developing plays, meaningless runs, wasted downs, etc.

Look at the ball possession in the Bears game.  WTF is happening?

We can't get any freaking momentum.  The players are not focused.

Everyone is to blame.

Including Rivera, who has reverted back to the same clock management issues from his first 2 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Either Turner, Norwell and Kalil are extremely overrated in the huddle or our RB flat out suck.

 

Either way I’m 100% positive that a good RB would have out produced both Stewart and Mccaffrey by now with this same line and scheme. 

I think Norwell is pretty overrated. I think he’s good, but not to the degree of the fame his look and demeanor get him around here. But I think the problem with our line is 75% on Shula. Between the calls themselves and almost as importantly how late the bad calls are getting in, the defense not only knows pretty much where we’re  running but also exactly when to fire off the snap in order to get an advantage over our OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And those targets are mostly going to TMac, who will be a part of the FUTURE of the team. Did it remove the most reliable WR and Bryce's safety blanket? Absolutely. But it's also allowing him to build better chemistry with TMac, Stephens, Horn, Evans, etc. I am pumped to see Coker back and hopefully they can reignite that connection. 
    • It's the same thing that made Bryce the #1 overall pick. I've never seen such mass delusion about a football player before. Everyone convinced themselves that the fact that Bryce was below to severely below average in practically every physical attribute for an NFL QB just wouldn't matter because he has everything else you need and that'll more than make up for it. When has such an argument ever been made for an NFL prospect before? We watch prospects plummet every year because they run a couple tenths slower in the 40 time than expected. Smitty had everything you want in a receiver except he was 5'9" so he goes in the 3rd round. That's the way these things generally go. If you check a lot of boxes but leave some key ones unchecked you're not an elite prospect. With Bryce though, the physically limitations were always obvious so it gave more time to be able to build that into the equation and come up with reasons for why he'd be able to overcome it. Now we have all these same shortcomings having shone brightly on the NFL field and we STILL have people trying to convince themselves he'll be able to overcome it while ignoring that our past two wins and his improved play have come while riding the back of RB putting up GOAT RB production over the past two weeks. What changed wasn't Bryce. What changed is that Rico is playing out of his damn mind. Pretty much every NFL roster caliber QB can shine if he can get 200+ yards out of the RB behind him.
    • I'm gonna manifest that poo!
×
×
  • Create New...