Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Word is Steve Wilks Might Become HC Under Giants Newly Hired GM - David Gettleman

beastson

By beastson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

So it looks like we'll have Panthers' satellite teams upstate and in the Big Apple haha

....but...I wouldn't put much stock in Wilks.  He's an easy target for outsiders to connect dots with but DG didn't pick the coaches that were in place when he arrived.  This is his first chance at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted

I think Wilks is OK, but we just made the Bucs look like the Patriots in their prime. Receivers wide open and missed tackles. Maybe the next month is his chance to show he is ready. Win a SB and you can guarantee he will be a head coach somewhere next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Who, other than people on here, said this?

Wilks is not good.

Wilks has only been a coordinater for a year, and has the defense in the top 10. Top 10 with a secondary that’s not very good. People preach on how it would be foolish to give up on players or coaches after a year, what makes this situation different 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Wilks has only been a coordinater for a year, and has the defense in the top 10. Top 10 with a secondary that’s not very good. People preach on how it would be foolish to give up on players or coaches after a year, what makes this situation different 

Part of the reason this secondary’s not very good is how predictable Wilks is with 3rd down blitzing. Most offenses counter quite easily and stress the secondary to do the impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Part of the reason this secondary’s not very good is how predictable Wilks is with 3rd down blitzing. Most offenses counter quite easily and stress the secondary to do the impossible.

Well, obviously there’s got to be a reason he’s blitzing so much. Maybe it could be to mask for the secondary not being as good as you and others think. Hell, Bradberry can’t even turn around around when the ball is in the air. No need to trust him on a receiver for too long. Worley is the king of PI’s. He’s having trouble staying on his man, so you don’t want him left with a receiver too long. Coleman has clearly regressed, and it’s quite clear Norman (the guy Wilks helped molded) made him.

Wilks has made some questionable decisions, but to say he’s not good is asinine. His defense is still top 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Well, obviously there’s got to be a reason he’s blitzing so much. Maybe it could be to mask for the secondary not being as good as you and others think. Hell, Bradberry can’t even turn around around when the ball is in the air. No need to trust him on a receiver for too long. Worley is the king of PI’s. He’s having trouble staying on his man, so you don’t want him left with a receiver too long. Coleman has clearly regressed, and it’s quite clear Norman (the guy Wilks helped molded) made him.

Wilks has made some questionable decisions, but to say he’s not good is asinine. His defense is still top 10

The blitz would be just fugin fine if the DBs weren't 36.7 yards off the LOS.....literally any person with 1 arm could complete passes to the WR with that much space....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...