Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton Predicts There to Be A Complete Overhaul of the Panthers RB Position Through Draft and Free Agency


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

he's whatever he needs to be...great hands, playmaker...yeah you right  don't need him...

Nowhere did I say he wasn't good. What I did say was that he plays the same position as it's being suggested that CMC play and, like corners, some receivers are better in the slot than outside and vice versa. Considering that Landry plays 3/4 of his snaps in the slot it's indisputable overlap and doesn't seem to make much sense since he may not be the same player from outside.

I've no issue with CMC playing the slot or Landry playing the slot but if the plan is for CMC to be there more often then WR money would seem to be better spent on someone who is proven to do well on the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I still think Stewart has something left.  My gut tells me that the scheme (read option) isn't his forte. 

I want to see them line up run Armah through first and Stewart to follow.  I bet his YPC would go back up. 

The read option used to be pretty good but as defenses always do.  They figure it out and things just get congested at the line.

 

1 hour ago, bigdog10 said:

I think Stewart could give you 10-15 good carries a game behind a fullback. This read option based running game has completely misused Stewart over the last couple of years. 

Most of Stewart’s runs this season weren’t from the read option though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

Nowhere did I say he wasn't good. What I did say was that he plays the same position as it's being suggested that CMC play and, like corners, some receivers are better in the slot than outside and vice versa. Considering that Landry plays 3/4 of his snaps in the slot it's indisputable overlap and doesn't seem to make much sense since he may not be the same player from outside.

I've no issue with CMC playing the slot or Landry playing the slot but if the plan is for CMC to be there more often then WR money would seem to be better spent on someone who is proven to do well on the outside.

lol...he can play any spot...don't box yourself in...a play  maker is a play maker...he definitely would be a great asset to this team...the only negative is the cost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

 

Would keep Stew if he restructures.  I think he has a lot left.  I agree his problems this year were the scheme, predictable 1st down run up the middle, no downfield passing game, etc.  I too would love to see him with a FB.  He might be excited enough about turner to stay for less....if given the opportunity.

I agree.   Stewart is still a beast.  If they don't fix our Oline it doesn't matter who we get.  Adrian Peterson in is prime would do no better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

lol...he can play any spot...don't box yourself in...a play  maker is a play maker...he definitely would be a great asset to this team...the only negative is the cost

Box myself in... are you even reading what I'm writing? I think somebody like Allen Robinson or Sammy Watkins would be a much better fit and value if CMC moves to the slot, not because Landry isn't good (he is) but because they're proven on the outside. Robinson is a bit more of a question mark coming off the injury but that's where the value part comes in.

On topic, if CMC goes to the slot then that would leave a big hole in the backfield if every other RB is gone too. Keeping him back there would be a much better fit for a guy like Landry and that scenario would make a ton of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...